2022
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Fermi-LAT blazars with Bayesian neural networks

Abstract: The use of Bayesian neural networks is a novel approach for the classification of γ-ray sources. We focus on the classification of Fermi-LAT blazar candidates, which can be divided into BL Lacertae objects and Flat Spectrum Radio Quasars. In contrast to conventional dense networks, Bayesian neural networks provide a reliable estimate of the uncertainty of the network predictions. We explore the correspondence between conventional and Bayesian neural networks and the effect of data augmentation. We find that Ba… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the final results, we use the full dataset for training. The lower end of this accuracy range corresponds to the setups with m DM = 30 GeV and m DM = 80 GeV, and is comparable to the accuracy achieved when learning classification between different classes within the 4FGL catalog, as in [34]. This further supports our approach and shows that the bias from comparing synthetic data with real data is negligible given the realistic simulation approach we have set up.…”
Section: Jcap07(2023)033supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the final results, we use the full dataset for training. The lower end of this accuracy range corresponds to the setups with m DM = 30 GeV and m DM = 80 GeV, and is comparable to the accuracy achieved when learning classification between different classes within the 4FGL catalog, as in [34]. This further supports our approach and shows that the bias from comparing synthetic data with real data is negligible given the realistic simulation approach we have set up.…”
Section: Jcap07(2023)033supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Machine learning classifiers have been used in recent years to study UNID sources [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] and to search for potential dark subhalos. Using XGBoost classifiers on sources in the third Fermi-LAT catalog, ref.…”
Section: Jcap07(2023)033mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the abovementioned studies predominantly use machine-learning methods of the unsupervised type, where only the observed features of the GRBs are inputted into the models, but not the labels (the GRBs' physical classes being Type I or II). On the other hand, the other type of machinelearning methods, supervised methods, are also commonly employed by astronomy researchers in the classification of other astronomical objects (e.g., Luo et al 2023;Zhu-Ge et al 2023;Connor & van Leeuwen 2018;Butter et al 2022;Coronado-Blázquez 2022;de Beurs et al 2022;Fan et al 2022;Villa-Ortega et al 2022;Yang et al 2022a;Kaur et al 2023), although studies on the application of supervised methods on GRB are scarce. Since supervised methods take both features and labels as input, and can produce deterministic predictions of the class of new GRBs, they can be helpful in identifying the true physical origin of intermingled GRBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unique advantages of the acoustic signal recognition method can be fully leveraged to characterize fluid flow inside columns. 16 In addition, supervised learning methods, such as artificial neural network, 17 decision tree, 18 Bayesian networks, 19 K-nearest neighbor, 20 and support vector machine (SVM), 21 with a continuous update property, can be combined with sound processing technologies to achieve fluid state recognition and fault classification. In this study, sieve tray distillation columns were investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%