2019
DOI: 10.3390/app9224781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Fully Grouted Rock Bolts with Empirical Classification Systems

Abstract: Empirical classification systems do not provide details of the factors that affect the performance of fully grouted rock bolts, as they are based on average values. Fully grouted rock-bolt patterns during tunnel-support design are a part of the composite support, and they are functions of rock-mass quality and tunnel span. Various fully grouted rock bolts are used in situ in different environments, along with other tunnel-support materials in static and dynamic environments during tunnel construction. The rock… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the grout mix, the water to cement ratio was 0.45 by weight. In rock bolting, typical water to cement ratios of grout mixes vary between 0.35 and 0.45 by weight [14][15][16][17]. There were five different grout mix groups with no polymer, 3.5% and 7.0% polymer (SMS and MS Polymer) additives by weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the grout mix, the water to cement ratio was 0.45 by weight. In rock bolting, typical water to cement ratios of grout mixes vary between 0.35 and 0.45 by weight [14][15][16][17]. There were five different grout mix groups with no polymer, 3.5% and 7.0% polymer (SMS and MS Polymer) additives by weight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach, the thickness of shotcrete and spacing of the rock bolt were applied with the tunnel span in the support chart for the RMR and Q systems. In tunnel composite support, the contribution of the rock bolt and shotcrete to the support are different, owing to numerous factors; therefore, no criterion is available for choosing rock-bolt-spacing-based rock mass quality (Q2*and RMR2*) and shotcrete thickness, along with tunnel-span-based rock mass quality (Q1*and RMR1*) weightage for the back calculation [71]. Therefore, five cases were chosen, and Table 6 lists the details [72].…”
Section: Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for projects in urban areas, a soil nail-prestressed anchor composite retaining structure is preferable. This is because the additional prestressed anchors can assist, in addition to the soil nails, to limit the displacement of the slope surface [12][13][14][15]. A typical layout of the soil nail-prestressed anchor composite retaining structure is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%