2017 13th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iccp.2017.8117036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of EEG signals in an object recognition task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average classification accuracy over all three object exploration modalities was 83.89% [14]. Rus et al found that the EEG features in gamma wave were more suitable for object recognition, and they used three different classifiers (SVM, KNN, and ANN) to classify objects, yielding accuracies of 89.5%, 89.5%, and 83%, respectively [15], consistent with the highest classification accuracy obtained using gamma waves in all brain waves in this study. Using EEG signals, Lam et al implemented a single-layer neural network method to identify and classify landscape images and animal images, yielding an average accuracy of 91.15%, in which the average recognition rate of landscape images was 89.69%, and that of animal images was 92.34% [17].…”
Section: Recognition Accuracy Of Landscape Structure and Color Based On Machine Learningsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The average classification accuracy over all three object exploration modalities was 83.89% [14]. Rus et al found that the EEG features in gamma wave were more suitable for object recognition, and they used three different classifiers (SVM, KNN, and ANN) to classify objects, yielding accuracies of 89.5%, 89.5%, and 83%, respectively [15], consistent with the highest classification accuracy obtained using gamma waves in all brain waves in this study. Using EEG signals, Lam et al implemented a single-layer neural network method to identify and classify landscape images and animal images, yielding an average accuracy of 91.15%, in which the average recognition rate of landscape images was 89.69%, and that of animal images was 92.34% [17].…”
Section: Recognition Accuracy Of Landscape Structure and Color Based On Machine Learningsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Fast Fourier transform was used to extract frequency band information. T frequency-domain features were extracted to obtain the logarithmic frequency energy v ues of the waves in five frequency bands: delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 H beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30), and gamma (>30 Hz) [43]. The absolute EEG value for various types of pictures show that the natural landsca play a certain role in recovery from stress, whereby alpha waves (8-13 Hz) and beta wav (13-30 Hz) are the most suitable indicators [3].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our investigation revealed that FFT, PCA, WT, and AR were the most widely used and effective methods for feature extraction among the reviewed articles in this domain; these methods were reported as superior 31%, 19%, 15%, and 15% of the time, respectively. For example, FFT has been implemented by researchers in several published studies [ 81 , 196 , 211 , 239 , 240 , 241 , 242 ] to extract features on the basis of the frequency of the EEG signals; however, another study has confirmed AR as one of the most reliable methods [ 243 ]. We also identified several essential feature extraction techniques that were less frequently applied in MWL tasks, including entropy and HHT, which elicited features of both nonlinear and non-stationary signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, Shah and Ghosh [ 55 ] have developed a real-time classification system by using PCA and a simple KNN classification algorithm. Interestingly, the studies in references [ 196 , 241 ] have proposed using FFT to evaluate the PSD on the basis of the time domain features incorporated in different ML models for classification. The results indicated the highest accuracy with KNN, at 99.42% and 90.5%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%