Classification of EEG Signals for Discrimination of Two Imagined Words

Bejestani, Mohammad Reza Asghari; Mohammad-Khani, Gholam Reza; Gorgin, Saeid; Nafisi, Vahid Reza; Farahani, Ghaolam Reza

doi:10.29252/jsdp.17.2.120

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some had poor absolute results like Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) as classifier or raw EEG signal amplitudes as features. Some had weaker results than those reported here, e.g., Principle Component Analysis (PCA) features with a Minimum-Distance classifier [ 30 ], or using Banana montage for EEG signals [ 31 ]. Some did not fulfil our requirements, for example, Random Forest Classifier (RFC) needs to be separately configured and trained for each class combination.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

EEG-Based Multiword Imagined Speech Classification for Persian Words

Bejestani

Khani

Nafisi

et al. 2022

BioMed Research International

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study focuses on providing a simple, extensible, and multiclass classifier for imagined words using EEG signals. Six Persian words, along with the silence (or idle state), were selected as input classes. The words can be used to control a mouse/robot movement or fill a simple computer form. The data set of this study was 10 recordings of five participants collected in five sessions. Each record had 20 repetitions of all words and the silence. Feature sets consist of normalized, 1 Hz resolution frequency spectrum of 19 EEG channels in 1 to 32 Hz bands. Majority rule on a bank of binary SVM classifiers was used to determine the corresponding class of a feature set. Mean accuracy and confusion matrix of the classifiers were estimated by Monte-Carlo cross-validation. According to recording the time difference of inter- and intraclass samples, three classification modes were defined. In the long-time mode, where all instances of a word in the whole database are involved, average accuracies were about 58% for Word-Silence, 60% for Word-Word, 40% for Word-Word-Silence, and 32% for the seven-class classification (6 Words+Silence). For the short-time mode, when only instances of the same record are used, the accuracies were 96, 75, 79, and 55%, respectively. Finally, in the mixed-time classification, where samples of every class are taken from a different record, the highest performance achieved with average accuracies was about 97, 97, 92, and 62%. These results, even in the worst case of the long-time mode, are meaningfully better than random and are comparable with the best reported results of previously conducted studies in this area.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%