1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990715)86:2<288::aid-cncr13>3.0.co;2-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of cutaneous malignant melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Melanoma subtype was based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria [60]. Solar elastosis was evaluated for all samples with available slides and adjacent dermis (131/170) using the method of Weyers et al [61]. Solar elastosis measurement was performed by a pathologist (AC) blinded to case ID number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melanoma subtype was based on the World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria [60]. Solar elastosis was evaluated for all samples with available slides and adjacent dermis (131/170) using the method of Weyers et al [61]. Solar elastosis measurement was performed by a pathologist (AC) blinded to case ID number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current WHO classification (1) is based on the melanoma classification proposed by Clark and colleagues (2) more than 30 years ago, which uses morphologic aspects of the early (radial) growth phase and the body site of the primary melanoma to distinguish four main types: superficial spreading melanoma (SSM), lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), nodular melanoma (NM) and acral-lentiginous melanoma (ALM). The system captures archetypical patterns of clinical and histological presentation, however a portion of melanomas cannot be unequivocally categorized in any of the categories (3) and its impact on clinical care, in particular that of advanced disease has been limited.…”
Section: Classification Of Melanocytic Neoplasmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Initially these subsets were well received, but more recently it has been suggested that a high proportion of melanomas cannot easily be subclassified using this classification, and that because the classification appears to carry no independent prognostic significance it should be abandoned. 3 The critics, however, base their case almost exclusively on pathological observations, while Clark and colleagues were at pains to emphasize that their classification depended the combination of clinical and pathological features. As the clinical appearance and biological behaviour of the early growth phase of these four subtypes is very different, it is suggested that they are currently worth retaining.…”
Section: Clinical Variantsmentioning
confidence: 99%