2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.115160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of crystalline insulators without symmetry indicators: Atomic and fragile topological phases in twofold rotation symmetric systems

Abstract: Topological crystalline phases in electronic structures can be generally classified using the spatial symmetry characters of the valence bands and mapping them onto appropriate symmetry indicators. These mappings have been recently applied to identify thousands of topological electronic materials. There can exist, however, topological crystalline non-trivial phases that go beyond this paradigm: they cannot be identified using spatial symmetry labels and consequently lack any classification. In this work, we ac… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
(120 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a refined partitioning of energy bands has been recently applied to certain C 2 T -symmetric and PT -symmetric systems (C 2 is π rotation, T is time reversal, and P is space inversion) when symmetry indicators are not necessarily available. Indeed, information from the irreducible representations [21,23,25] and elementary band representations [26], may not be sufficient to diagnose the fragile criterion, rather similar to how they cannot detect Chern number, or the Kane-Mele Z 2 invariant [45] and the Z 2 nested Berry phases [46][47][48], in certain scenarios. In this context, the consideration of multiple spectral gaps recently provided new insights into the fragile band topology characterized by Wilson loop winding (Euler class) [36,46,49] and has led to the prediction of a new kind of reciprocal braiding of band nodes inside the momentum space [46,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a refined partitioning of energy bands has been recently applied to certain C 2 T -symmetric and PT -symmetric systems (C 2 is π rotation, T is time reversal, and P is space inversion) when symmetry indicators are not necessarily available. Indeed, information from the irreducible representations [21,23,25] and elementary band representations [26], may not be sufficient to diagnose the fragile criterion, rather similar to how they cannot detect Chern number, or the Kane-Mele Z 2 invariant [45] and the Z 2 nested Berry phases [46][47][48], in certain scenarios. In this context, the consideration of multiple spectral gaps recently provided new insights into the fragile band topology characterized by Wilson loop winding (Euler class) [36,46,49] and has led to the prediction of a new kind of reciprocal braiding of band nodes inside the momentum space [46,[50][51][52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This delocalized charge accumulation is also consistent with the profile of j 0 1 (θ) in Eq. (26). Now, let us consider the 3D fourth-order TI.…”
Section: B Numerical Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fragile topology is one interesting characteristics of some TCIs discovered in recent theoretical studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. In general, TCIs are not adiabatically deformable to atomic insulators without breaking symmetries, that is, they have an obstruction to constructing exponentially localized symmetric Wannier states [28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because Kramers' theorem inevitably doubles the electronic charges, making the real-space invariants partially, often completely, trivial. Progress can be made identifying (partial) Berry phase 29 invariants and/or using Wilson loops as topological indices [45][46][47][48][49] as exemplified by the bulk-dislocation charge correspondence of rotation-symmetric two-dimensional crystals 31 . This additional knowledge, however, does not completely determine the (fractional) quantized electronic charges at the crystal boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%