Classification of cryptocurrency coins and tokens by the dynamics of their market capitalizations

Abstract

We empirically verify that the market capitalizations of coins and tokens in the cryptocurrency universe follow power-law distributions with significantly different values for the tail exponent falling between 0.5 and 0.7 for coins, and between 1.0 and 1.3 for tokens. We provide a rationale for this, based on a simple proportional growth with birth and death model previously employed to describe the size distribution of firms, cities, webpages, etc. We empirically validate the model and its main predictions, in terms of proportional growth (Gibrat's Law) of the coins and tokens. Estimating the main parameters of the model, the theoretical predictions for the power-law exponents of coin and token distributions are in remarkable agreement with the empirical estimations, given the simplicity of the model. Our results clearly characterize coins as being ‘entrenched incumbents’ and tokens as an ‘explosive immature ecosystem’, largely due to massive and exuberant Initial Coin Offering activity in the token space. The theory predicts that the exponent for tokens should converge to 1 in the future, reflecting a more reasonable rate of new entrants associated with genuine technological innovations.

Are Bitcoin Bubbles Predictable? Combining a Generalized Metcalfe's Law and the LPPLS Model

“…14 With standard errors already above 10% induced by estimated parameters, excluding additional prediction uncertainty due to persistent fluctuations of active users about the mean. 15 Although the parameters vary depending on the fitting window, even allowing for fitting windows starting in 2016, where one obtains a high exponent β (above 2.5), an overvaluation of about a factor of two is still indicated.…”

Dissection of Bitcoin's Multiscale Bubble History

“…As a response to investor's growing demand for alternative investments in the cryptocurrency market, the emergence of a multitude of new digital coins ensued. Throughout 2017, the cryptocurrency market changed its structure from being dominated by Bitcoin to a more diversified market offering numerous technologies and variants of cryptocurrencies [79]. Figure 12 shows the dominance of Bitcoin at the beginning of 2017 over the complete cryptocurrency market with its market share, measured with respect to the total market capitalization of the top 1000 cryptocurrencies, being as high as 90%.…”

Using correlated stochastic differential equations to forecast cryptocurrency rates and social media activities

“…A prevalent and common choice is the Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) which has been used for modeling stocks (Merton 1973;Black and Scholes 1973;Wilmott et al 1995;Reddy and Clinton 2016;Øksendal 2003) and more recently also for cryptocurrencies Tarnopolski 2017;Kreuser and Sornette 2018;Wu et al 2018). There is, however, debate on the extent these assets follow GBM dynamics.…”

“…While GBM operates using Gaussian noise, there is evidence that the noise distribution of stocks such as the S&P 500 has curvature different than a normal distribution (Mantegna and Stanly 2000). Implication of this difference is most prominent in the frequency of rare events as a result of heavy-tailed noise, also possibly present for cryptocurrencies (Kreuser and Sornette 2018;Wu et al 2018;Fry 2018). For small sample sizes, this difference is small enough that many continue to use GBM and other variants for modeling.…”