2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2019.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of coronary artery diseased and normal subjects using multi-channel phonocardiogram signal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Refs. Method Input data type Detection task Performance % 31 Time–frequency analysis of PCG signal using chirplet transform PCG Valve disease diagnosis Accuracy 98.33 32 Recurrent neural network with long short-term memory CCTA Calcified plaque detection Accuracy 90.3 Sensitivity 92.1 Specificity 88.9 33 CNN ECG Diagnosis of different cardiovascular diseases Accuracy 95 34 Optimal time–frequency concentrated biorthogonal wavelet-based features ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 98.53 35 Binomial rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model CCTA, ECG CAD diagnosis Sensitivity 99 Specificity 88 36 Discrete wavelet transform, multivariate multi-scale entropy, ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 98.67 37 Sequential minimal optimization, Naive Bayes, and ensemble algorithm ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 88.5 38 Computing complex ventricular excitation index Magneto-cardiography CAD diagnosis Sensitivity 91 Specificity 84 39 Extracted time- and frequency-domain feature...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Refs. Method Input data type Detection task Performance % 31 Time–frequency analysis of PCG signal using chirplet transform PCG Valve disease diagnosis Accuracy 98.33 32 Recurrent neural network with long short-term memory CCTA Calcified plaque detection Accuracy 90.3 Sensitivity 92.1 Specificity 88.9 33 CNN ECG Diagnosis of different cardiovascular diseases Accuracy 95 34 Optimal time–frequency concentrated biorthogonal wavelet-based features ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 98.53 35 Binomial rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model CCTA, ECG CAD diagnosis Sensitivity 99 Specificity 88 36 Discrete wavelet transform, multivariate multi-scale entropy, ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 98.67 37 Sequential minimal optimization, Naive Bayes, and ensemble algorithm ECG CAD diagnosis Accuracy 88.5 38 Computing complex ventricular excitation index Magneto-cardiography CAD diagnosis Sensitivity 91 Specificity 84 39 Extracted time- and frequency-domain feature...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, this segmentation approach necessitates expertise and specialized equipment. 13 On the other hand, non-ECG methods such as envelope detection (Hilbert transform, Homomorphic filtering, and Shannon energy) or segmentation based on K-Mean statistical models, HMM (Hidden Markov Model), and HSMM (Hidden semi-Markov Model) were proposed. However, due to the fluctuations of behavioral characteristics of cardiac signals in different people, especially at different ages, it is impossible to use a fixed method to find cardiac cycles and systole-diastole locations.…”
Section: Basic Concepts and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic useful frequency ranges of ECG and PCG are usually accepted as 0.05-75Hz [24] and 25-250Hz [25], respectively. Therefore, all raw signals were first bandpass filtered with second-order Butterworth filters with the passband of 0.05-75 Hz for ECG and 25-250 Hz for PCG followed by band-stop filtering to remove the power interference (50 Hz) [26], [27].…”
Section: B Construction Of Cardiac Electromechanical Time-seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%