1993
DOI: 10.1177/000348949310200807
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Congenital Middle Ear Anomalies Report on 144 Ears

Abstract: The surgical findings in 144 successive ears operated on for congenital conductive hearing loss were analyzed, and the results were evaluated in terms of hearing gain. All the patients underwent middle ear surgery at the University Hospital Nijmegen between 1964 and 1990. A classification system was developed to analyze the findings. Class 1 comprises ears with congenital isolated stapes ankylosis. Class 2 comprises ears with congenital stapes ankylosis in combination with a congenital anomaly of the ossicular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
130
1
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
130
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomalies identified among the 78 cases were described based on 21 different types and included ( Figure 1): (1) no incus long process (5 cases), (2) no incus long process with a fibrous band (3 cases), (3) fused malleus and incus (2 cases), (4) an incus fused to the medial attic wall (1 case), (5) a malleus fused to the anterior attic wall (1 case), (6) a stapes without an anterior crus (3 cases), (7) no anterior crus and no incus long process (3 cases), (8) no anterior crus and no incus long process with a fibrous band (1 case), (9) no stapes suprastructure and no incus long process (6 cases), (10) a stapes footplate fixation only (36 cases), (11) stapes footplate fixation without an anterior crus (4 cases), (12) stapes footplate fixation without an anterior crus and incus long process (2 cases), (13) stapes footplate fixation with obturator foramen obliteration (1 case), (14) stapes footplate fixation without a lenticular process, only a fibrous band (1 case), (15) stapes footplate fixation without a stapes head (1 case), (16) stapes footplate fixation with a monopolar crus and no incus long process (1 case), (17) underdeveloped stapes crura without an oval window (2 cases), (18) anterior and posterior crura fusion without an oval window (1 case), (19) no stapes and no oval window (2 cases), (20) no stapes and no oval window without an incus long process (1 case), (21) no stapes and no oval window with an incus long process fused to the promontrium (1 case).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anomalies identified among the 78 cases were described based on 21 different types and included ( Figure 1): (1) no incus long process (5 cases), (2) no incus long process with a fibrous band (3 cases), (3) fused malleus and incus (2 cases), (4) an incus fused to the medial attic wall (1 case), (5) a malleus fused to the anterior attic wall (1 case), (6) a stapes without an anterior crus (3 cases), (7) no anterior crus and no incus long process (3 cases), (8) no anterior crus and no incus long process with a fibrous band (1 case), (9) no stapes suprastructure and no incus long process (6 cases), (10) a stapes footplate fixation only (36 cases), (11) stapes footplate fixation without an anterior crus (4 cases), (12) stapes footplate fixation without an anterior crus and incus long process (2 cases), (13) stapes footplate fixation with obturator foramen obliteration (1 case), (14) stapes footplate fixation without a lenticular process, only a fibrous band (1 case), (15) stapes footplate fixation without a stapes head (1 case), (16) stapes footplate fixation with a monopolar crus and no incus long process (1 case), (17) underdeveloped stapes crura without an oval window (2 cases), (18) anterior and posterior crura fusion without an oval window (1 case), (19) no stapes and no oval window (2 cases), (20) no stapes and no oval window without an incus long process (1 case), (21) no stapes and no oval window with an incus long process fused to the promontrium (1 case).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this, Arslan and Giacomelli [14] classified ossicular anomalies into five types, Ombredann [15] into three types, House [16] into five types, and Funasaka [8] into three types. In 1993, Teunissen and Cremers [4] analyzed their surgical findings in 144 ears with congenital conductive hearing loss, and reported a classification system to describe their findings, as follows. Class 1 includes ears with congenital isolated stapes ankylosis; class 2, ears with congenital stapes ankylosis in combination with a congenital anomaly of the ossicular chain; class 3, ears with congenital anomalies of the ossicular chain and at least a mobile stapes footplate; class 4, ears with aplasia or severe dysplasia of the oval window or round window.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most common anomaly in this area consists of aplasia of the long process of the incus and the head of the stapes [14][15][16][17]. Absence of the incus long process bone and stapedial crura (as in cases 4, 5, 7, 9) was easily recognized with both VE image and SSD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible for a conductive hearing loss to result from fibrous atrophy of the long process of the incus in which the periosteum remains intact but there is no real bony continuity [14,17]. This condition of incudal pseudocontinuity produced by the intact periosteum creates a surgical and radiological diagnostic trap [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%