2017
DOI: 10.21320/2500-2139-2017-10-4-494-500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Conditioning Regimens for Bone Marrow Transplantation: Historical Background and Current Perspectives

Abstract: Hematopoietic stem cells transplantation is a current standard treatment for many oncohematological diseases. The milestone of any type of transplantation is the choice of conditioning regimen. This article presents the principles of classification of conditioning regimens in terms of myeloablativity and discusses the concepts of “autologous transplantation”, “high-dose chemotherapy supported by hematopoietic stem cells”, “allogeneic transplantation” and “immunotherapy”. Up-to-date uniform classification of co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Europe, only about 15% of patients receive PT-Cy for leukemia in unrelated transplants, while this technology is dominant with haploidentical donors. It should also be noted that the proportion of haploidentical transplantations does not exceed 20% [4,[30][31][32][33]. Such differences are likely determined by demographic characteristics, low probability of having a related compatible donor, as well as shorter life expectancy in Russia and a large number of co-morbidities in Russian patients [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, only about 15% of patients receive PT-Cy for leukemia in unrelated transplants, while this technology is dominant with haploidentical donors. It should also be noted that the proportion of haploidentical transplantations does not exceed 20% [4,[30][31][32][33]. Such differences are likely determined by demographic characteristics, low probability of having a related compatible donor, as well as shorter life expectancy in Russia and a large number of co-morbidities in Russian patients [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%