1976
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(76)90271-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of clinical pain descriptions by multiple group discriminant analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
1
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
85
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further research is needed to more accurately clarify the description of different headache types. It should be reminded that the MPQ can be used to distinguish painful symptoms (22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is needed to more accurately clarify the description of different headache types. It should be reminded that the MPQ can be used to distinguish painful symptoms (22) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-report pain assessment tools Pain assessment tools such as numerical and verbal rating scales are simple to administer and attempt to make the pain experience 'measureable' by categorizing and quantifying aspects of the experience. These tools have been used in research settings to measure changes in intra-individual pain across time (Defrin, Grunhaus, Zamir, & Zeilig, 2007;McCaffrey & Freeman, 2003), and distinguish between different types of pain (Crawford, 2009;Dubuisson & Melzack, 1976). However, it is not clear that these tools necessarily provide more detailed or useful information than would be obtained from verbal self-report.…”
Section: Alternative Methods Of Obtaining Information About Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This normally athletic woman had guarded ambulation due to pain that she described as severe and debilitating. Initial visual analog scale [15][16][17] for pain was 59 out of 100; and her low back Oswestry Disability Index [18][19][20][21] was 55 out of 100, indicating severe disability. 18 She demonstrated a mild to moderate left antalgic stance with obvious distress when arising from a seated position.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%