2020
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of childhood medulloblastoma into WHO‐defined multiple subtypes based on textural analysis

Abstract: Childhood medulloblastoma is a case of a childhood brain tumour that requires close attention due to the low survival rate. Effective prognosis depends a lot on accurate detection of its subtype. The present study proposes a texture-based computer-aided categorization of childhood medulloblastoma samples. According to the World Health Organization, it has four subtypes (desmoplastic, classic, nodular and large). Classification is done in two levels: (i) normal and abnormal and (ii) its four subtypes. The syste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noticed from these results that fusing all these features does not always guarantee the best performance. Therefore, the authors (Das et al, 2020b) searched for the best combination of these feature extraction methods and found that fusing only four features sets (GLCM + Tamura + LB + GRLN) has the highest impact on the classification performance, obtaining an accuracy of 91.3% using SVM classifier and 96.7% using PCA with SVM classifier. This means that investigating a different combination of feature sets and selecting the most influential fused feature set can improve the accuracy of the classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be noticed from these results that fusing all these features does not always guarantee the best performance. Therefore, the authors (Das et al, 2020b) searched for the best combination of these feature extraction methods and found that fusing only four features sets (GLCM + Tamura + LB + GRLN) has the highest impact on the classification performance, obtaining an accuracy of 91.3% using SVM classifier and 96.7% using PCA with SVM classifier. This means that investigating a different combination of feature sets and selecting the most influential fused feature set can improve the accuracy of the classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found out that the MANOVA method increased the classification accuracy to 65.2%, which is greater than that of 56.5% without MANOVA. In the same year, Das et al (2020b) decided that instead of using individual sets of features (Das et al, 2018b), they produced various groups of fused features to study the influence of feature fusion and selected the best mixture of fused feature sets. They employed PCA and SVM and achieved an accuracy of 96.7% utilizing the four combined features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Details of the dataset can be found in [ 33 ]. The dataset can be found at [ 34 ]. Samples of normal and MB subtypes’ images available in the dataset are shown in Figure 1 which are (a) normal, (b) classic, (c) desmoplastic, (d) large cell, and (e) nodular.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Principal component analysis (PCA), as well as multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) [32], were used for feature dimensionality reduction. Das et al [43] also experimented with various combinations of feature sets and fused four features to obtain a classification accuracy of 96.7% using PCA as a feature reduction method and a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. Only texture-based features were used in that study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%