1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Abstract: This review will consider some of the major issues in the classification of child and adolescent psychopathology. The central issue will be the value of classification systems in child and adolescent psychopathology research. Some comment will also be made on the value of the existing classifications in clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0
8

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 204 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
125
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many different approaches to validating phenotypes 5 but for the purpose of molecular genetic studies, phenotypes should at least be heritable as well as reliably measured. In this paper, we consider what classical genetic studies tell us about heritable ADHD-related phenotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many different approaches to validating phenotypes 5 but for the purpose of molecular genetic studies, phenotypes should at least be heritable as well as reliably measured. In this paper, we consider what classical genetic studies tell us about heritable ADHD-related phenotypes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cantwell (1996) purports that diagnostic criteria should specify which diagnostic instrument to use, what informants to use and how to rate for presence and severity of the criteria. For example, one might specify that a certain number and type of symptoms should be present in order to make a particular diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Internal validity was examined by testing hypothesized factor models of the internal structure of anxiety disorders. Such an examination can help shed light on the conceptualization of anxiety and its disorders among youth (Cantwell, 1996). The findings suggest that DSM-IV SAD, SOP, and SP can be conceptualized as distinct but related diagnostic entities, thus supporting the DSM-IV's classification of psychiatric disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Internal validity refers to the testing of hypotheses regarding the internal structure of a diagnostic entity (e.g., are anxiety disorders distinct entities or a single entity? ), which can help shed light on the conceptualization of a psychiatric disorder (Cantwell, 1996). As noted, most of the extant research on internal validity of DSM anxiety disorders has been limited to data gathered mainly by rating scales in non-clinical samples of predominantly Caucasian youth.…”
Section: Research On Internal Validity Of Dsm Anxiety Disorders In Youthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation