2013 36th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2013.6614010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of cardiotocography records by random forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ensemble classifiers have also shown promising performance in similar studies (Tomas et al, 2013 ; Peterek et al, 2014 ). Therefore, we also consider the AdaBoost classifier (Schapire, 1999 ) in this study as a representation of ensemble classifiers.…”
Section: Features Processingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Ensemble classifiers have also shown promising performance in similar studies (Tomas et al, 2013 ; Peterek et al, 2014 ). Therefore, we also consider the AdaBoost classifier (Schapire, 1999 ) in this study as a representation of ensemble classifiers.…”
Section: Features Processingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is commonly used statistical technique used for the classification. The worth of each distinct tree in not essential, the purpose of random tree is to reduce the error rate of the whole forest [22]. The error rate depends upon two factors i.e.…”
Section: Random Forest (Rf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we consider the Random Forest (RF) classifier [23], [74]. This algorithm uses an ensemble of many randomised decision-trees to vote on the classification outcome.…”
Section: Ensemble Classifiers Have Shown To Have Powerful Classificatmentioning
confidence: 99%