2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of cancer cells using computational analysis of dynamic morphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, one year later, the same group designed a flow-through lab-on-chip device that took advantage of the surface-bound aptamer’s affinity for EGFR, the biomarker overexpressed in GBM, to demonstrate that a microfluidic-based approach can be used to detect and isolate GBM cells [ 31 ]. The group then advanced the diagnostic use of anti-EGFR aptamers with two subsequent articles on the tracking of the differential dynamics of GBM cell morphology on aptamer-grafted substrates, and on the analysis of dynamic morphology in computational single-cell metrics to detect and recognize tumor cells [ 22 , 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, one year later, the same group designed a flow-through lab-on-chip device that took advantage of the surface-bound aptamer’s affinity for EGFR, the biomarker overexpressed in GBM, to demonstrate that a microfluidic-based approach can be used to detect and isolate GBM cells [ 31 ]. The group then advanced the diagnostic use of anti-EGFR aptamers with two subsequent articles on the tracking of the differential dynamics of GBM cell morphology on aptamer-grafted substrates, and on the analysis of dynamic morphology in computational single-cell metrics to detect and recognize tumor cells [ 22 , 29 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It thus follows that detecting such morphological cues could greatly help in the identification of those cells that are most responsible for the metastatic process. Importantly, early identification of cancerous or pre-cancerous morphodynamic phenotypes could enable early detection of cancers which produce no known biomarkers, such as is the case for pancreatic cancer [ 28 , 41 ]. In future work, it would be beneficial to extend the dynamic morphodynamics platform to demonstrate sensitive differentiation of such cells, which could be of important diagnostic value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study demonstrated that oncogenesis and metastasis were associated with characteristic changes in morphology [ 11 , 26 ]. While studies have been conducted that differentiate cancerous from non-cancerous cells [ 27 , 28 ], we have extended this analysis to compare metastatic with non-metastatic cell types. It would be of significant utility if a morphodynamic classification system could be built for suspended cells, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or those harvested from a biopsy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current machine learning approaches of image detection such as logistic regression (LR), SVM (support vector machine), and LR + SVM 11,12 use hand‐made characteristics such as shape, pixel density, texture, and off‐shelf classification. Cell image features are classified on the bases of analysis of histopathological image features 13 and HEp‐2 cell IIF images, 14 detection of cancer cells by SVM and random forest tree, 15 and classification of apical echocardiograms 16 . Deep learning method is used to investigate medical injury 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%