2019
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.6.4.046003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of brain tumor isocitrate dehydrogenase status using MRI and deep learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DenseNet-161 with five-fold cross-validation was found to be the best performing model with few preprocessing steps. It attained a mean slice-wise accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 90.5%, 83.1%, and 94.8%, respectively, and a subject-wise accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 83.8%, 83.5%, and 83.5%, respectively [20]. Bangalore et al [16]…”
Section: Models Used To Predict the Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation Statusmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…DenseNet-161 with five-fold cross-validation was found to be the best performing model with few preprocessing steps. It attained a mean slice-wise accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 90.5%, 83.1%, and 94.8%, respectively, and a subject-wise accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 83.8%, 83.5%, and 83.5%, respectively [20]. Bangalore et al [16]…”
Section: Models Used To Predict the Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutation Statusmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In 19 studies, the researchers determined the DL model accuracy. In six studies [15][16][17][18][19][20], the authors reported the sensitivity of the DL model used, and in five studies [15,16,[18][19][20], the authors reported the specificity of the DL models. In eight studies, the researchers examined glioma grading by using different DL models compared with other models [19,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, such validation based on tissue sampling can be challenging, as it is evident from report by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) that around 35% in-vivo surgeries obtained adequate tissue samples to confirm the IDH class [1]. Recently, non-invasive prediction using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is proved as more helpful for initial diagnosis and immediate treatment planning for cancer patients [2,3]. The various machine learning algorithms [4][5][6] or deep learning techniques [7,8] have been applied to radiogenomic studies of glioma to predict genotypes and survival outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%