“…In the case of physics-based models (Abhale et al, 2022(Abhale et al, , 2020Austin et al, 1997;Dong et al, 2007;Roeplal et al, 2023;Yu and Shen, 2022), mass, momentum and enthalpy balance equations are solved for the furnace to predict HMSi and other blast furnace performance indicators such as hot metal temperature, furnace permeability, fuel rate and productivity. In the case of data-driven models (Bhattacharya, 2005;Chuanhou Gao et al, 2011;Diniz et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2021;Gaopeng, 2011;Gao-peng et al, 2021bGao-peng et al, , 2021aJian et al, 2015;Li et al, 2018Li et al, , 2017Li et al, , 2013Liu et al, 2007;Nurkkala et al, 2011;Saxén and Pettersson, 2007;Saxén et al, 2016;Shi-hua and Jiu-sun, 2007;Tang et al, 2009;Wang, 2018;Wang et al, 2019Wang et al, , 2015Wang et al, , 2022Wang and Liu, 2011;Zeng et al, 2008;Zhao et al, 2020), an empirical relationship between silicon content and various raw material and process parameters is established using historical operations data of the furnace through statistical, machine learning and deep learning techniques. Physics-based models are often computationally intensive and typically not suitable for real-time deployment.…”