2017
DOI: 10.14780/muiibd.329913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification Of BIST -100 Index’ Changes Via Machine Learning Methods

Abstract: The changes in

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the results, average DPA value is about 50% and DPA values change between 38% (KCHOL) and 70% (ARCLK). These results are on par with the results of the studies for stock movement prediction of BIST30 companies in the literature (Filiz & Öz, 2017; Özçalıcı, 2016). The results also show that our prediction model predicts monthly returns with an average RMS‐R value of 0.12; while the best RMS‐R value is 0.07 (ARCLK) and the worst RMS‐R value is 0.32 (BIMAS).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…According to the results, average DPA value is about 50% and DPA values change between 38% (KCHOL) and 70% (ARCLK). These results are on par with the results of the studies for stock movement prediction of BIST30 companies in the literature (Filiz & Öz, 2017; Özçalıcı, 2016). The results also show that our prediction model predicts monthly returns with an average RMS‐R value of 0.12; while the best RMS‐R value is 0.07 (ARCLK) and the worst RMS‐R value is 0.32 (BIMAS).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The entire data set is thus broken into pieces k times and used as testing sets. Then the mean of all the testing is computed to result in classification measures (Filiz & Öz, 2017).…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of the estimation results obtained was evaluated with the R 2 metric and values between 0.95-0.98 were reached. In the [7], the direction of change of the BIST 50 index was estimated with artificial neural networks (ANN), KNN, Naive Bayes and C4.5 decision tree models. The success of the estimation results obtained was evaluated with the classification accuracy, and the highest value was obtained as 92.71% with the C4.5 decision tree model.…”
Section: The Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%