2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04040.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of bacterial cell wall hydrolysases and their potentials as novel alternatives to antibiotics - a response to the letter of Biziulevicius and Kazlauskaite

Abstract: This is a response to the letter of Biziulevicius and Kazlauskaite, who made a few valuable comments on our recent paper published on the Journal of Applied Microbiology regarding the classification and potential clinic applications as alternative antibiotics of bacterial cell wall hydrolases (BCWH). We confirm that it is of significant practical and theoretical relevance to categorize BCWH according to their sources owing to their strikingly different antibacterial specificities, which are of critical importa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lysozymes, which are defined here as lytic enzymes produced by animals or plants as a part of their defence against the invasion of bacteria, are the most well studied BCWHs. However, virolysins are deemed to be the most promising enzybiotics among the three groups of BCWHs because [52]: 1) they have the capacity of rapidly killing sensitive bacteria, even if these bacteria are resistant to lysozymes; 2) they have in general narrow spectra of sensitive bacteria, minimizing the disturbance to normal microflora; 3) there is a tremendous diversity of lytic bacteriophages in the biosphere [1], which guarantees the availability of virolysins targeting almost any Gram-positive bacteria; 4) the bacteriolytic activity of bacteriophages to their hosts is easily detectable, providing a solid basis for rational selection of bacteriophages for isolation of desired virolysins targeting specific pathogenic bacteria.…”
Section: Virolysinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lysozymes, which are defined here as lytic enzymes produced by animals or plants as a part of their defence against the invasion of bacteria, are the most well studied BCWHs. However, virolysins are deemed to be the most promising enzybiotics among the three groups of BCWHs because [52]: 1) they have the capacity of rapidly killing sensitive bacteria, even if these bacteria are resistant to lysozymes; 2) they have in general narrow spectra of sensitive bacteria, minimizing the disturbance to normal microflora; 3) there is a tremendous diversity of lytic bacteriophages in the biosphere [1], which guarantees the availability of virolysins targeting almost any Gram-positive bacteria; 4) the bacteriolytic activity of bacteriophages to their hosts is easily detectable, providing a solid basis for rational selection of bacteriophages for isolation of desired virolysins targeting specific pathogenic bacteria.…”
Section: Virolysinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a broader scope, virolysins belong to a group of bacterial cell wall hydrolases (BCWH), which can be classified into three sub-groups according to the sources of these enzymes: 1) lysozymes, BCWHs produced by animals and plants as an essential component of their innate defense system; 2) microlysins, BCWHs produced by microbes except those encoded by bacteriophages, i.e., virolysins; and 3) virolysins [52]. Lysozymes, which are defined here as lytic enzymes produced by animals or plants as a part of their defence against the invasion of bacteria, are the most well studied BCWHs.…”
Section: Virolysinsmentioning
confidence: 99%