2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-016-4076-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of archaeological pottery profiles using modal analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features result, for example, in traces on the potsherd surface, which can be left by the action of fingers or by tools, either intentionally, such as inscriptions and decorative motifs, or involuntarily, such as working signs. More recently, some methods have been proposed that can improve the visualization of these detail features through the calculation of shape descriptors of the fragment surface [ 21 ]. In [ 22 ], parabolic contours are used to help in the reconstruction of ceramic artifacts recovered from an archaeological excavation in a fragmented state with missing pieces.…”
Section: Archaeological Feature Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features result, for example, in traces on the potsherd surface, which can be left by the action of fingers or by tools, either intentionally, such as inscriptions and decorative motifs, or involuntarily, such as working signs. More recently, some methods have been proposed that can improve the visualization of these detail features through the calculation of shape descriptors of the fragment surface [ 21 ]. In [ 22 ], parabolic contours are used to help in the reconstruction of ceramic artifacts recovered from an archaeological excavation in a fragmented state with missing pieces.…”
Section: Archaeological Feature Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%