Classification of antecedents towards safety use of health information technology: A systematic review

A systematic literature review and a proposed model on antecedents of trust to use social media for e-government services

“…A systematic literature review (SLR) has been selected as the methodology of research in this paper. The systematic literature review (SLR) uses some detailed and rigorous criteria to explore, critically evaluate and synthesizes all the literature on a specific topic (Salahuddin and Ismail, 2015). This paper uses a systematic literature review methodology proposed by Brereton et al (2007) which is used by many researchers consistently in the field of software engineering and information systems.…”

Professional culture, information security and healthcare quality—an interview study of physicians’ and nurses’ perspectives on value conflicts in the use of electronic medical records

“…The study also showed how concerns such as the need to maintain a trustful relationship with the patient may compromise information security in terms of completeness, relevancy, and timeliness. Reliable and exhaustive information is crucial, but the professionals were concerned about the validity and quality of data in the EMRs, as has been found by others [24].…”

The Effectiveness of Health Care Information Technologies: Evaluation of Trust, Security Beliefs, and Privacy as Determinants of Health Care Outcomes (Preprint)

“…As shown in Figure 1, the dimensions of success in the model are information quality, system quality, service quality, system use/intention to use, and user satisfaction 29,30 . In the context of patient safety, information quality refers to the completeness, relevance, accuracy, and timeliness of medical information; system quality refers to the usability, compatibility, reliability, and response time of the HIT; and service quality refers to the technical support and assurance (availability, integrity, and authenticity) of the HIT as well as the quality of service received 30 . Patients and healthcare providers alike, evaluate HITs in terms of the information quality, system quality, and the service quality 31,32 , all of which, are components of the DMISSM 29,30 .…”

“…In the context of patient safety, information quality refers to the completeness, relevance, accuracy, and timeliness of medical information; system quality refers to the usability, compatibility, reliability, and response time of the HIT; and service quality refers to the technical support and assurance (availability, integrity, and authenticity) of the HIT as well as the quality of service received 30 . Patients and healthcare providers alike, evaluate HITs in terms of the information quality, system quality, and the service quality 31,32 , all of which, are components of the DMISSM 29,30 . Beyond just HIT features, a patient's decision to use HIT also depends on nontechnical success factors and facilitating conditions such as behavioral controls and work processes 33 , HIT cost, the individual's technical background and skill set, health conditions (e.g., visual impairment), and information privacy concerns 34 .…”

“…These constructs are commonly studied along with success measures of perceptions about the system, like ease of use, usefulness, and enjoyment 35 . A large part of the purpose of HIT is protecting and improving patient safety 30 .…”