2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40846-020-00548-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of Alzheimer’s Disease from 18F-FDG and 11C-PiB PET Imaging Biomarkers Using Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] The same approach applied to amyloid PET also demonstrated accuracies of >85% for predicting MCI conversion and diagnosing AD. 115,117,[119][120][121] Non-SVM approaches, such as convolutional neural networks and deep learning, on FDG PET and amyloid PET showed variable performance in predicting a final diagnosis of AD, cognitive decline, or MCI conversion, 46,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132] with accuracy between 75% and 100%. Model accuracy in multicenter studies (>70% accuracy) was lower than that of those relying on local datasets (>78% accuracy).…”
Section: Pet/spect Imagingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[107][108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118] The same approach applied to amyloid PET also demonstrated accuracies of >85% for predicting MCI conversion and diagnosing AD. 115,117,[119][120][121] Non-SVM approaches, such as convolutional neural networks and deep learning, on FDG PET and amyloid PET showed variable performance in predicting a final diagnosis of AD, cognitive decline, or MCI conversion, 46,[122][123][124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132] with accuracy between 75% and 100%. Model accuracy in multicenter studies (>70% accuracy) was lower than that of those relying on local datasets (>78% accuracy).…”
Section: Pet/spect Imagingmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Also, a developed algorithm called "Support Vector Machine Leave-One-Out Recursive Feature Elimination and Cross-Validation" (SVM-RFE-LOO) for early detection of AD was proposed 15 . Moreover, several researchers also used SVM concerning the detection of AD [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] . For instance 25 , used Artificial Neural Network (ANN) with MRI images to perform prediction for the transition from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to AD with an accuracy of 89.5%.…”
Section: Very Severe Cogniɵve Decline (Very Severe Demenɵa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FDG PET, amyloid PET and/or MRI) were more accurate in terms of diagnosis of both MCI and AD (Shao et al 2020;Zu et al 2016;Zhan et al 2015;Ortiz et al 2015;L. Liu et al 2015;Yang et al 2020;Xu et al 2015;Ben Bouallegue et al 2018). An additional approach used PET and structural MRI data in combination with other markers (i.e.…”
Section: Pet/spect Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al 2014). The same approach applied to amyloid PET also demonstrated accuracies of >85% for predicting MCI conversion and diagnosing AD(El-Gamal et al 2018;Yang et al 2020;Zhan et al 2015;Xu et al 2015;Nozadi and Kadoury 2018). Non-SVM approaches, such as convolutional neural networks and deep learning, on FDG PET and amyloid PET showed variable performance in predicting a final diagnosis of AD, cognitive decline or MCI conversion(Choi and Jin 2018;Ding et al 2019;Huang et al 2019;Son et al…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation