2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep11(2015)002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification of 6d N = 1 0 $$ \mathcal{N}=\left(1,0\right) $$ gauge theories

Abstract: We delineate a procedure to classify 6d N = (1, 0) gauge theories composed, in part, of a semi-simple gauge group and hypermultiplets. We classify these theories by requiring that satisfy some consistency conditions. The primary consistency condition is that the gauge anomaly can be cancelled by adding tensor multiplets which couple to the gauge fields by acting as sources of instanton strings. Based on the number of tensor multiplets required to cancel the anomaly, we conjecture that the UV completion of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
290
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
290
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the above expression, mass and Coulomb branch deformations are encoded in the terms in parenthesis: the leading order pole gives the mass deformation, and the subleading gives the contribution to Coulomb branch. The pole structure of this puncture is (1,4,5,7,8,11). The same…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)123mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the above expression, mass and Coulomb branch deformations are encoded in the terms in parenthesis: the leading order pole gives the mass deformation, and the subleading gives the contribution to Coulomb branch. The pole structure of this puncture is (1,4,5,7,8,11). The same…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)123mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The crucial data is to identify the local pole structures to the various differentials i (z). This data has been worked out in [73] for E 6 class S theory, and the result is: the pole structure of i near the full puncture is (1,4,5,7,8,11) and the order of pole near the minimal puncture is (1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3) [73].…”
Section: Jhep11(2015)123mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations