2017
DOI: 10.1080/00206814.2017.1287014
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification, formation, and transport mechanisms of mud clasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several physical processes can account for the failure of firmer sediments or for their differentiated attributes when alternated with softer and/or water‐impregnated deposits. The designation of aspect and end products resulting from a variety of different processes includes intraclast lag deposits, early diagenetic concretions, hiatus concretions, (lime) mud clasts, mobile rockgrounds, limestone or carbonate breccias, autoclastic breccias, unusual intraclastic limestones, autoconglomerates (Bouchette et al, ; Chen, ; Chough, Kwon, Choi, & Lee, ; Gupta, ; Hesselbo & Palmer, ; Krajewski, Olchowy, & Felisiak, ; Li et al, ; Palmer & Wilson, ; Wignall & Twitchett, ; Zatoń, ; Zatoń et al, ). Interestingly, none of these contributions mention the term “lump,” although some reported features comparable with certain aspects of the lumpy limestones here under investigation, justifying the potential of physically dominated processes to explain the presence of particular lump types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several physical processes can account for the failure of firmer sediments or for their differentiated attributes when alternated with softer and/or water‐impregnated deposits. The designation of aspect and end products resulting from a variety of different processes includes intraclast lag deposits, early diagenetic concretions, hiatus concretions, (lime) mud clasts, mobile rockgrounds, limestone or carbonate breccias, autoclastic breccias, unusual intraclastic limestones, autoconglomerates (Bouchette et al, ; Chen, ; Chough, Kwon, Choi, & Lee, ; Gupta, ; Hesselbo & Palmer, ; Krajewski, Olchowy, & Felisiak, ; Li et al, ; Palmer & Wilson, ; Wignall & Twitchett, ; Zatoń, ; Zatoń et al, ). Interestingly, none of these contributions mention the term “lump,” although some reported features comparable with certain aspects of the lumpy limestones here under investigation, justifying the potential of physically dominated processes to explain the presence of particular lump types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of isolated lithic elements in an otherwise homogeneous matrix is a rather common feature throughout the geological archive. These are commonly argued to be the result of the particular attributes of the sediments combined with the effects of physical processes acting on a variety of settings (Bouchette et al, ; Chen, ; Chough et al, ; Gupta, ; Krajewski et al, ; Li et al, ; Palmer & Wilson, ; Wignall & Twitchett, ; Zatoń, ; Zatoń et al, ). The specific cases described for very shallow, proximal, and energetic settings can here be excluded due to major differences in depositional setting (Figure b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the beds, which deposited after the intraclast-rich basal beds, typically show trough or ripple-cross stratification with set heights of 5-15 cm. Vertical orientation of rip-up clasts can be observed in matrix-rich debrites or turbidites deposited under high-energy turbulent hyperpycnal to homopycnal flow conditions (Li et al, 2017). Those are unconformably overlying lacustrine, laminated mud strata from the prodelta environment.…”
Section: Sedimentological Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lithology was dominated by the intercalation of calcareous sandstone and calcareous claystone (SC), grain flow, slump, and mud clast ( Figure 2). According to Li et al (2017) the mud clast can be categorized as a failure of muddy banks and transportation in the channel and the failure of muddy base and transportation of debris flows. The intercalation of calcareous sandstone and calcareous claystone which was dominated by sedimentary structures such as graded bedding, parallel lamination (Figure 2a), and convolute.…”
Section: Lithologymentioning
confidence: 99%