2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/820/1/8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Ranking of Fermi Lat Gamma-Ray Sources From the 3fgl Catalog Using Machine Learning Techniques

Abstract: We apply a number of statistical and machine learning techniques to classify and rank gamma-ray sources from the Third Fermi Large Area Telescope Source Catalog (3FGL), according to their likelihood of falling into the two major classes of gamma-ray emitters: pulsars (PSR) or active galactic nuclei (AGNs). Using 1904 3FGL sources that have been identified/associated with AGNs (1738) and PSR (166), we train (using 70% of our sample) and test (using 30%) our algorithms and find that the best overall accuracy (>9… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
174
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
174
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 lists these candidates. To check for consistency, we compared our list of candidates with results from spectral fitting of 3FGL unassociated sources (Bertoni et al 2015), as well as with pulsar predictions using a combination of Random Forest and Logistic Regression (Saz Parkinson et al 2016). The list of Galactic candidates at high Galactic latitude is in good agreement with both of these works.…”
Section: Prediction Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Table 3 lists these candidates. To check for consistency, we compared our list of candidates with results from spectral fitting of 3FGL unassociated sources (Bertoni et al 2015), as well as with pulsar predictions using a combination of Random Forest and Logistic Regression (Saz Parkinson et al 2016). The list of Galactic candidates at high Galactic latitude is in good agreement with both of these works.…”
Section: Prediction Resultssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…We evaluate our framework with data from the 3FGL Catalog [2] and compare our results with those based on the method in [1]. Our experiments are divided into two parts: the PSR/AGN classification and the YNG/MSP classification.…”
Section: Experiments and Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main stages in our framework shown in Figure 1 which illustrates (i) the preprocessing stage, (ii) the feature selection stage and (iii) the classification stage. In our framework, RFs are used for feature selection without prior knowledge after the input data is cleaned and pre-processed in the same way as [1]. In the classification stage of our framework, boosted logistic regression (LR) with the features automatically selected in stage (ii) is used to build the prediction model.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations