2007
DOI: 10.1097/mlg.0b013e31813544ce
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Management of Tracheoesophageal and Tracheopharyngeal Fistulas After Laryngectomy

Abstract: Leakage of TEF in prosthetic voice restoration usually responds well to conservative measures. If these measures fail, and in all cases of TPF, surgical intervention is necessary for transtracheostomal or transcervical closure with multilayer sutures of the esophagus and trachea. Persisting TEF/TPF after unsuccessful surgical attempts at revision surgery remain challenging. Our experiences show that tracheostoma transposition for dissociation of the cranial end of the trachea and the hypopharynx and esophagus … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, an attempt to classify different types of fistulas has been published. This classification by Gehrking et al [21] is based on clinical experience and classifies fistulas as type I, high TEF; type II, enlarged high TEF; type III, deep TEF; type IV, TPF and type V, TPF associated with pharynx stenosis. In the present report, the classifications are based on the anatomic shapes and dimensions obtained with the silicone casts of the fistulas and adjacent structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, an attempt to classify different types of fistulas has been published. This classification by Gehrking et al [21] is based on clinical experience and classifies fistulas as type I, high TEF; type II, enlarged high TEF; type III, deep TEF; type IV, TPF and type V, TPF associated with pharynx stenosis. In the present report, the classifications are based on the anatomic shapes and dimensions obtained with the silicone casts of the fistulas and adjacent structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases these TEF or TPF go hand in hand with stenoses of the neopharynx. According to the location, size and associated stenoses, TEF/TPF can be classified as type I: high TEF; type II: enlarged high TEF; type III: deep TEF; type IV: TPF; and type V: TPF associated with pharynx stenosis) [9]. Several published surgical approaches revealed that TEF/TPF can be closed by radial forearm flap [1,2,6,12], sternocleidomastoid muscle flap [23], pectoralis major flap [5], deltopectoral flap [16], multiple layer closure [14] or tracheal ascension [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The insertion of a voice prosthesis is a simple and rapid surgical procedure and an easy method of voice rehabilitation that is associated with only a low rate of complications. The literature describes only a few cases of severe life-threatening complications such as oesophageal perforation with mediastinitis, soft-tissue abscesses, or spinal injuries [1,13,25]. In contrast, minor local problems occur more often and include the formation of biofilms on the prosthesis with subsequent prosthesis failure, spasms, or stenoses in the cricopharyngeal segment with limited swallowing and voicing as well as granulation tissue formation in the region of the tracheo-oesophageal fistula, periprosthetic leakage as a result of fistula enlargement with subsequent aspiration symptoms [13,14,29,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%