2016
DOI: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.84039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Health Risk Assessment for Borehole Water Contaminated by Metals in Selected Households in Southwest Nigeria

Abstract: Samples of borehole water were randomly collected from twenty households in the Lagos-Ogun axis of southwestern Nigeria. The samples were analyzed for silver, iron, manganese, lead, nickel, magnesium, cadmium, zinc, sodium, potassium, pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, electrical conductivity, alkalinity, total hardness, chloride, nitrate and sulphate following standard methods of water analysis. Results obtained were compared with global background values and WHO guidelines for drinking water. The pH values ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The t-test statistical analyses (Table 5) of pH and metal values obtained for water and sediments in the 2016 and 2018 sampling cycles revealed statistically non-significant differences. This is a pointer to the fact that the sources of pollution are unaltered [33]. Nevertheless, the calculated F-statistic, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( Table 6 and Table 7) for the samples reveal statistically significant differences in the water samples for, copper, nickel and zinc (2016) and for zinc (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The t-test statistical analyses (Table 5) of pH and metal values obtained for water and sediments in the 2016 and 2018 sampling cycles revealed statistically non-significant differences. This is a pointer to the fact that the sources of pollution are unaltered [33]. Nevertheless, the calculated F-statistic, using analysis of variance (ANOVA) ( Table 6 and Table 7) for the samples reveal statistically significant differences in the water samples for, copper, nickel and zinc (2016) and for zinc (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The samples were transported from the field to the laboratory for analysis. The samples were kept at 5˚C in the refrigerator until they were analyzed at the laboratory [33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The unwholesomeness of drinking water resulting from contaminants released from different anthropogenic sources has become a global concern [1,2]. Over at least the past two decades, there has been increased concern regarding the quality of tap water due to pollution and its undesirable taste and odor [3,4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%