2022
DOI: 10.32604/csse.2022.019333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and Diagnosis of Lymphoma’s Histopathological Images Using Transfer Learning

Abstract: Current cancer diagnosis procedure requires expert knowledge and is time-consuming, which raises the need to build an accurate diagnosis support system for lymphoma identification and classification. Many studies have shown promising results using Machine Learning and, recently, Deep Learning to detect malignancy in cancer cells. However, the diversity and complexity of the morphological structure of lymphoma make it a challenging classification problem. In literature, many attempts were made to classify up to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…*is way, resources can be saved and the efficiency of the model can be improved during training. A great number of breast cancer diagnosis methods based on transfer learning have been proposed and implemented by distinct researchers (e.g., [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]) to achieve state-of-the-art performance (e.g., ACC, AUC, PRS, RES, and F1S) on different datasets. Yet, the limitations of such performance indices, algorithmic assumptions, and computational complexities are indicating a further development of smart algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*is way, resources can be saved and the efficiency of the model can be improved during training. A great number of breast cancer diagnosis methods based on transfer learning have been proposed and implemented by distinct researchers (e.g., [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]) to achieve state-of-the-art performance (e.g., ACC, AUC, PRS, RES, and F1S) on different datasets. Yet, the limitations of such performance indices, algorithmic assumptions, and computational complexities are indicating a further development of smart algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%