Classification and Comparison of Strategic Information Systems Planning Methodologies

Abstract

Strategic planning for information systems remains as one of the top concerns and continues to be a critical issue for many chief information officers and their organisations. Also, a comprehensive review of the recent information systems planning literature reveals that selecting a proper methodology used in developing an information systems plan is one of the success factors related to the success of the IS planning process. Although this individual success factor should have attracted more research and discussions, there have not been enough attempts to create a framework to compare and classify strategic information systems planning methodologies to select a proper method for a specific organisation with its unique requirements, hence a gap in literature. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is primarily to bridge this gap by proposing a conceptual framework to classify strategic information systems planning methodologies to choose the suitable methodology(ies) according to specific requirements of an organisation.

Implementation of Delone & Mclean is Success Model as an Evaluation of Resource Management Information System at Dapoer Widya

“…Quality of service is the overall support offered by information system providers, ensuring information systems can be implemented properly (Kandjani, 2014).…”

“…Kualitas layanan merupakan pelayanan yang di dapatkan pengguna dari pengembang sistem informasi, layanan dapat berupa updatesistem dan respon dari pengembang jika sistem informasi mengalami masalah. Beberapa indikator pada kualitas layanan adalah kecepatan respon, kemampuan teknik dan pelayanan setelahnya dari pengembang (Kandjani, 2014). Dari segi kualitas layanan, penelitian oleh (Rahayu, 2018) dan penelitian (Veri, 2022) menunjukkan adanya pengaruh positif kualitas layanan terhadap kepuasan pemakai.…”

An Effectiveness Model for Enterprise Architecture Methodologies

“…EA Implementation Methodology (EAIM) can describe the structured approach in order to solve some (Kandjani, Mohtarami, Taghva, & Andargoli, 2014) or all of the problems related to EA implementation (Chung & McLeod, 2002;Medini & Bourey, 2012). EAIM covers all aspects of the EA lifecycle -the planning for enterprise understanding projects, the analysis of business requirements, the design of systems, the evolution of systems, and the ongoing enhancements of all of the aforementioned aspects (Aier & Saat, 2011).…”

Perencanaan Strategis Pada Perusahaan Digital Rintisan (Startup): Studi Kasus Siber Teknologi Indonesia

“…Menurut tinjauan komprehensif baru-baru ini literatur perencanaan sistem informasi mengungkapkan bahwa memilih metodologi yang tepat dalam mengembangkan rencana sistem informasi merupakan salah satu faktor keberhasilan yang berkaitan dengan keberhasilan proses perencanaan Sistem Informasi (Kandjani, 2014). Hal ini didukung oleh Studi berbasis survei memberikan bukti kuat bahwa perusahaan dengan strategi sistem informasi (baik inovator atau konservatif) berperforma lebih baik daripada mereka yang tidak didefinisikan (Leidner, D.E., Lo,J., Preston,D, 2011).…”