2005
DOI: 10.1306/07050504121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classification and characterizations of biogenically enhanced permeability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences in permeability could also be explained by variations in bioturbation intensity observed at the mm-scale: The three higher permeability samples (RA1, RA2 and RA6) exhibit a more homogeneous host sediment containing isolated silt-filled burrows bearing high concentrations of pyrite (Figure 2a). Where packages of coarser grained sediment occur within a low permeability substrate, they have been shown to increase permeability (Pemberton & Gingras 2005). The texture of the lower permeability samples (RA12, RA13…”
Section: Microstructural Controls On Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differences in permeability could also be explained by variations in bioturbation intensity observed at the mm-scale: The three higher permeability samples (RA1, RA2 and RA6) exhibit a more homogeneous host sediment containing isolated silt-filled burrows bearing high concentrations of pyrite (Figure 2a). Where packages of coarser grained sediment occur within a low permeability substrate, they have been shown to increase permeability (Pemberton & Gingras 2005). The texture of the lower permeability samples (RA12, RA13…”
Section: Microstructural Controls On Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further investigations found other examples in distributary channel deposits and upper shoreface sands, but in most cases, cryptic bioturbated sands were limited in thickness and lateral extent (Blanpied and Bellaiche, 1981;Dashtgard and Gingras, 2003;Gingras et al, 2008;Howard and Frey, 1975;Naruse and Masuda, 2006;Pemberton and Gingras, 2005;Pemberton et al, 2008;Rouble and Walker, 1997;Sohn, 1997). Many ancient marginal-marine examples have been reported in Talang Akar fields of Indonesia, North Ranklin Field of Australia, Fureal and Misoa fields of Venezuela, the Frontier Formation in the United States, and the Kuparuk and Sag River formations in Alaska (see Pemberton et al, 2008, for additional references).…”
Section: Cryptic Bioturbation and Cryptobioturbation In Marginal-marimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The observed porosity in thin-section (micron scale), shows that the porosity is associated with: 1) dissolution of organic matter or dolomitic material caused by diagenesis; 2) bioturbation-enhanced porosity resulting from burrows by organisms; and 3) fracture porosity along bedding planes. [89] [90] have shown that reservoir enhancement in unconventional thinly bedded, silty to muddy lithologies of unconventional reservoir with low permeability can be enhanced by the activity of burrows.…”
Section: Interpretation Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%