2019 3rd International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ismsit.2019.8932878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classificatin of Brain Tumors by Machine Learning Algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the literature this dataset was tested with KNN, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) machine learning algorithms. SVM algorithm with 90% accuracy rate was found to be better compared to other algorithms [29]. As seen in the examples, machine learning algorithms are commonly used approaches in classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In the literature this dataset was tested with KNN, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) machine learning algorithms. SVM algorithm with 90% accuracy rate was found to be better compared to other algorithms [29]. As seen in the examples, machine learning algorithms are commonly used approaches in classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Different classification techniques have been proposed by many authors for identifying tumor types from brain images. Different authors have classified tumor into a variety of ways, for instance meningioma, glioma, and pituitary [ 109 , 121 , 122 , 124 , 125 ]; astrocytoma, glioblastoma, and oligodendrogliamo [ 112 ]; glioma tumor grades (I–IV) [ 113 ]; benign and malignant stages(I–IV) [ 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 ]; diffuse midline glioma, medulloblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, and ependymoma [ 102 ]; multifocal, multicentric, and gliomatosis [ 130 ]; ependymoma and pilocytic astrocytoma [ 120 ].…”
Section: Brain Tumor Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brain tumor classification, the most commonly used classifiers are neural network [ 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 131 ], support vector machines (SVM) [ 108 , 115 , 124 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 132 , 133 ], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [ 112 , 121 , 130 , 134 ], Adaboost [ 126 ], and hybrid models [ 113 , 135 , 136 ]. The neural network was implemented using different architectures, such as feedforward neural network [ 110 , 125 ], multilayer perceptron neural network [ 109 , 137 ], and probabilistic neural network (PNN) [ 111 , 131 ].…”
Section: Brain Tumor Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of the best machine-learning and classification algorithms was to learn from training automatically and make a wise judgment with high accuracy [180] Liver Disease J48, SVM& NB…”
Section: Genomic Medicine and Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%