2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.92.015026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classically conformalU(1)extended standard model and Higgs vacuum stability

Abstract: We consider the minimal U(1) ′ extension of the Standard Model (SM) with conformal invariance at the classical level, where in addition to the SM particle contents, three generations of right-handed neutrinos and a U(1) ′ Higgs field are introduced. In the presence of the three right-handed neutrinos, which are responsible for the seesaw mechanism, this model is free from all the gauge and gravitational anomalies. The U(1) ′ gauge symmetry is radiatively broken via the Coleman-Weinberg mechanism, by which the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, with extended scalar, gauge and flavour sectors, it is natural to ask whether the vacuum of the this class of models is in a stable configuration both at the classical and at the quantum level and what is the impact of the new physics on the SM EW ground state [20,21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Indeed, the extrapolation of the SM to high energy scales, through the RG equations, exhibits a scalar potential with a non-trivial structure: its minimum does not correspond to the EW vacuum which is found to be in a metastable configuration, very close to a phase transition [40,41].…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)086mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, with extended scalar, gauge and flavour sectors, it is natural to ask whether the vacuum of the this class of models is in a stable configuration both at the classical and at the quantum level and what is the impact of the new physics on the SM EW ground state [20,21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Indeed, the extrapolation of the SM to high energy scales, through the RG equations, exhibits a scalar potential with a non-trivial structure: its minimum does not correspond to the EW vacuum which is found to be in a metastable configuration, very close to a phase transition [40,41].…”
Section: Jhep07(2016)086mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our U(1) ′ extended SM, however, there is a parameter region to solve this electroweak vacuum instability problem [13,14]. 5 There are only three free parameters in our model, x H , v φ , and g X , which are also interpreted as x H , m Z ′ , and α g X = g 2 X /(4π).…”
Section: Solving the Electroweak Vacuum Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another example is (x H , x Φ ) = (−1, 2), which corresponds to the SM with the so-called U(1) R symmetry. When we choose (x H , x Φ ) = (−16/41, 2), the beta function of g X1 (g 1X ) at the 1-loop level has only terms proportional to g X1 (g 1X ) [13]. This is the orthogonal condition between the U(1) Y and U(1) ′ at the 1-loop level, under which g X1 and g 1X do not evolve once we have set g X1 = g 1X = 0 at an energy scale.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…See Appendix in Ref. [30] for a complete list. The RG equations for the gauge couplings at the one-loop level are given by …”
Section: A Rg Equations In the Minimal U(1) X Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%