Classically conditioned modulation of pain depends on stimulus intensity

Abstract

Innocuous cues that become associated with pain can enhance pain. This is termed classically conditioned hyperalgesia. The size of this effect varies under different conditions. We aimed to test whether the sensitising effect of pain-associated cues depends on the intensity of the paired test stimulus. To do this, two virtual reality environments were paired with either painful or non-painful vibrotactile stimuli in a counterbalanced fashion. The differential effect of the two environments was evaluated using pain intensity ratings of paired electrocutaneous test stimuli at three different intensity levels. Forty healthy participants were included in the study; 30 participants experienced sufficient pain during the learning phase and were included in the main analysis. An effect of environment (p = 0.014) and interaction between environment and test stimulus intensity was found (p = 0.046). Only the most intense test stimulus was modulated by environment. While the effect was small, the results are consistent with the proposition that pain-associated cues may induce hyperalgesia to some degree, under certain conditions. In particular, results highlight the potential relevance of stimulus intensity during and after the initial painful experience. Further attention is needed to comprehensively understand the variables that impact classically conditioned hyperalgesia.

The Differing Effects of Nociception and Pain Memory on Pain Thresholds in Participants with and without a History of Injury: A Pretest-Posttest Quasi Experimental Study

“…While varied responses occur, pain intensity will typically decrease and PPT increases during or after exposure to a painful stimulus [31] [32]. Prior research has used PPT to measure changes in pain perception for conditions such as osteoarthritis, [27] rheumatoid arthritis, [33] complex regional pain syndrome, [34] fibromyalgia, [35] low back pain, [28] shoulder pain, [29] headaches, [36] and whiplash injury [37]. The composite picture of these studies suggests that PPT can be used as a reliable and valid measure of pain perception and can measure differences between healthy subjects and those with pathology [38] [39] [40].…”

Dolor como respuesta condicionada

“…(2022) no existía evidencia empírica de que el dolor pudiera ser provocado por una señal aislada asociada con el dolor, pero sin estimulación nociceptiva. En cambio, sí existía amplia evidencia de que una señal asociada con el dolor podía aumentar su intensidad y disminuir el umbral del dolor en sujetos humanos (2,8,9). El trabajo de Franke y cols.…”