2020 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/qce49297.2020.00041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Optimizers for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Devices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Error amounts are drawn independently from err ≈ N(0, ) at each round of the classical optimizer. We used BOBYQA (Bound Optimization BY Quadratic Approximation) as implemented in SKQuant-Opt, [49] a standard optimizer package for near term hybrid quantum classical algorithms. Although we have simulated the results under a ion trap model, hidden inverse can be applied to other systems too(as an example to reduce errors in ZX gates for a superconducting hardware).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error amounts are drawn independently from err ≈ N(0, ) at each round of the classical optimizer. We used BOBYQA (Bound Optimization BY Quadratic Approximation) as implemented in SKQuant-Opt, [49] a standard optimizer package for near term hybrid quantum classical algorithms. Although we have simulated the results under a ion trap model, hidden inverse can be applied to other systems too(as an example to reduce errors in ZX gates for a superconducting hardware).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible area for exploration could be finding an ansatz that would result in a smoother cost function landscape with shallower circuits. More adapted classical optimization methods may also bring significant improvements in the optimization process as it was found that a considerable fraction of optimization runs got stuck in local minimas [28,46]. Improvement on that front may also substantially decrease the number of measurements required to reach comparable quality of solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the one-dimensional state returned by the quantum computer has to be translated into the X matrix from Equation (6). This is done via the f function defined for each encoding in Equations ( 12), (14), and (21) respectively. Similarly, the Y slack matrix also has to be unflattened.…”
Section: Encoding and Workflow Schedulingmentioning
confidence: 99%