2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.62.064030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical geometry from a physical state in canonical quantum gravity

Abstract: We construct a weave state which approximates a degenerate 3-metric of rank 2 at large scales. It turns out that a non-degenerate metric region can be evolved from this degenerate metric by the classical Ashtekar equations, hence the degeneracy of 3-metrics is not preserved by the evolution of Ashtekar's equations. As the s-knot state corresponding to this weave is shown to solve all the quantum constraints in loop quantum gravity, a physical state in canonical quantum gravity is related to the familiar classi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, there is no coupling between N c and ν, so there is no canonical seesaw mechanism available for m ν . As shown previously [6,7], there are in general three active and two sterile neutrinos in these E 6 models. They may acquire masses through their mixing with the extra neutral fermions (which are also leptons) at the TeV scale.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, there is no coupling between N c and ν, so there is no canonical seesaw mechanism available for m ν . As shown previously [6,7], there are in general three active and two sterile neutrinos in these E 6 models. They may acquire masses through their mixing with the extra neutral fermions (which are also leptons) at the TeV scale.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…If there is new physics at the TeV scale, it should be such that the above two properties are maintained. It has now been shown [4] that assuming the extended gauge symmetry to be a subgroup of the superstring-inspired E 6 , the success of leptogenesis requires it to be either SU (3) [5,6] or SU(3) C × SU(2) L × U(1) Y × U(1) N [7,8]. Only these two gauge groups allow the superfield N c to have zero quantum numbers with 3 Three recent proposals regarding the origin of neutrino mass but not baryogenesis are exceptions to this general rule: the models with enlarged Higgs Sector [2] and the models of bilinear R-parity breaking [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is arbitrary. These regions do not contribute to the construction of the operator, since the commutator terms like Â(s i ( )), VU v( ) s,c would vanish for all tetrahedron in the regions (13).…”
Section: Quantization Of the Hamiltonianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can even solve the Gaussian and diffeomorphism constraints to arrive at a diffeomorphism-invariant Hilbert space [8]. Certain geometrical operators are shown to have discrete spectra in the kinematical Hilbert space [9][10][11][12][13]. However, some important elements in this approach are not yet understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only 1-dimensional geometry living on these graphs, so the quantum geometry is polymer-like object. When one increases the amount of edges and graphs such that the graphs are densely distributed in Σ, the quantum state is highly excited and the quantum geometry can weave the classical smooth one [33][1] [99]. Because of this picture, the quantum kinematical representation which we obtain is also called polymer representation for backgroundindependent quantum geometry.…”
Section: • Kinematical Vacuum and Polymer Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%