2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0420-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical Geometries in Modern Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the product of vectors in E n+1 is understood to be the inner product with respect to the Euclidean metric, is called power of c1 and c2. It turns out that c1 and c2 touch each other respecting orientation if, and only if, (Benz (2012), proposition 3.43) P (c1, c2) = 0, and this is exactly the reflexive and symmetric contact relation studied in sphere geometry. Moreover, V can be equipped with a product defined as c1c2 = −r1r2 + a1a2.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…where the product of vectors in E n+1 is understood to be the inner product with respect to the Euclidean metric, is called power of c1 and c2. It turns out that c1 and c2 touch each other respecting orientation if, and only if, (Benz (2012), proposition 3.43) P (c1, c2) = 0, and this is exactly the reflexive and symmetric contact relation studied in sphere geometry. Moreover, V can be equipped with a product defined as c1c2 = −r1r2 + a1a2.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…All results mentioned in this paper belong to a young and active geometrical discipline called "characterizations of geometrical mappings under mild hypotheses". The discipline started around 1950 with fundamental theorems of A. D. Alexandrov on spacetime transformations and causal automorphisms (see [3]). Throughout the conditions in these theorems, for examples, Theorems A ∼ D and our main result, surjectivity, injectivity, hyperplane-preserving and non-degenerate assumptions play inevitable roles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mathematical formalism employed in the library cycle is based on Clifford algebras and the Fillmore-Springer-Cnops construction (FSCc), which has a long history, see [24, § 1.1], [20, § 4.1], [19], [25, § 4.2], [26], [13, § 4.2]. Compared to a plain analytical treatment [27,11], FSCc is much more efficient and conceptually coherent in dealing with FLT-invariant properties of cycles. Correspondingly, the computer code based on FSCc is easy to write and maintain.…”
Section: Problems and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated geometries span a wide domain, which includes conformal [8, Ch. 9], hypercomplex [9] and Lie sphere geometries [10,11,12]. For these fields the package facilitates:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%