2023
DOI: 10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2303181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Classical and Non-Classical Neural Communications

William Winlow,
Rouholah Fatemi,
Andrew S. Johnson

Abstract: This review was constructed to show how the connectome has evolved in motor command systems from simple command elements to complex systems of neurons utilizing parallel distributed processing and the possibility of quantum entanglement between groups of neurons. Scientific and medical interest in neural pathways and their connections have driven neuroscience and brain research for many decades so that specific systems and their feedback loops have been considered in detail. We review motor command systems in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, we are at an interesting point of advance in neuroscience and evidence was recently presented to show that in addition to the computational events taking place in the cortex, there may also be non-classical brain functions due to quantum entanglement between systems, as described by Kerskens and Perez (23), which also supports our view that the brain uses quantum computation (5). Their observations require detailed verification but strongly suggest quantum entanglement between systems, not previously observed directly or physiologically identified (15).…”
Section: The Visual Connectomesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Currently, we are at an interesting point of advance in neuroscience and evidence was recently presented to show that in addition to the computational events taking place in the cortex, there may also be non-classical brain functions due to quantum entanglement between systems, as described by Kerskens and Perez (23), which also supports our view that the brain uses quantum computation (5). Their observations require detailed verification but strongly suggest quantum entanglement between systems, not previously observed directly or physiologically identified (15).…”
Section: The Visual Connectomesupporting
confidence: 64%
“…No electrophysiological evidence has ever been found for such connections. In other words, systems of neurons without direct physiological or neurohumoral connections may well be able to influence one another, as we have discussed elsewhere (Winlow and Johnson, 2021;Winlow et al, 2023). Such concepts have been discussed in the past (Johnson, 2007;Larson, 2015), although the idea that quantum mechanics could in part explain higher brain functions was dismissed by some (e.g., Koch, 2006).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such concepts have been discussed in the past (Johnson, 2007;Larson, 2015), although the idea that quantum mechanics could in part explain higher brain functions was dismissed by some (e.g., Koch, 2006). Obviously, the observations of Kerskens and Pérez (2022) require detailed verification but strongly suggest quantum entanglement between systems whose connections had not been previously observed directly or physiologically identified (Winlow et al, 2023). These findings, if verified, would strongly support our view that the brain uses quantum computation (Johnson and Winlow, 2021), and as a quantum-phase computer, it would be expected of us to generate multiple non-classical connections of this type across the nervous system.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimuli cannot be recognized as simultaneous since the actions of the involved neurons are not cooperative. Even considering that some brain functions may be non-classical, i.e., occurring through nonlocal neuronal coupling, most likely the phenomena of consciousness and self-awareness [32], the time lag can be the same for stimuli of different objects (events) and other for stimuli of one thing (or event) but of different sensory modalities. Because the triggers of various events may coincide again, how can the blank mind independently attribute them to proper events?…”
Section: The Binding Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%