Classical and Molecular Genetic Research on General Cognitive Ability

Abstract

Arguably, no psychological variable has received more attention from behavioral geneticists than what has been called “general cognitive ability” (as well as “general intelligence” or “g”), and for good reason. GCA has a rich correlational network, implying that it may play an important role in multiple domains of functioning. GCA is highly correlated with various indicators of educational attainment, yet its predictive utility is not limited to academic achievement. It is also correlated with work performance, navigating the complexities of everyday life, the absence of various social pathologies (such as criminal convictions), and even health and mortality. Although the causal basis for these associations is not always known, it is nonetheless the case that research on GCA has the potential to provide insights into the origins of a wide range of important social outcomes. In this essay, our discussion of why GCA is considered a fundamentally important dimension of behavior on which humans differ is followed by a look at behavioral genetics research on CGA. We summarize behavioral genetics research that has sought to identify and quantify the total contributions of genetic and environmental factors to individual differences in GCA as well as molecular genetic research that has sought to identify genetic variants that underlie inherited effects.

Sexual Development in Adolescence: An Examination of Genetic and Environmental Influences

“…For example, as sexual behaviors become more normative in later adolescence, variation may become less strongly influenced by shared environmental forces. This prediction follows from the consistent finding that shared environmental influences on many psychological variables decrease with age (Burt, ; McGue & Gottesman, ; Plomin, DeFries, Knopik, & Neiderhiser, ). As adolescents grow older, environmental constraints on behavior are loosened so that genetically based individual differences are better able to manifest themselves and youth can more easily self‐select into preferred environments (a process often referred to as an active gene–environment correlation; Scarr & McCartney, ).…”

Effects of prenatal marijuana exposure on neuropsychological outcomes in children aged 1‐11 years: A systematic review

“…Thus, it is important to fully understand the risks of exposure in the light of the changing culture and political climate surrounding marijuana. On the other hand, additional factors, including genetics, maternal cognitive abilities, medical conditions, such as preterm birth or nutritional deficits, and environmental influences, such as parenting, preschool attendance or lead exposure, may influence the detectable effects of prenatal marijuana exposure …”

Taking a Stand: The Genetics Community's Responsibility for Intelligence Research

“…10 At this juncture, however, it is unclear whether the potential value of genotyping to assess cognitive skills outweighs the risks. Possible parental coercion for students to undergo genetic testing, the fear of stigma among children and parents, and the narrow but longstanding focus on one conception of intelligence (see the essay by Matt McGue and Irving I. Gottesman in this special report 11 ) are just a few of the unresolved ethical concerns raised by scientific inquiry into this topic. While one might respond that intelligence research could yield health benefits for individuals with cognitive disabilities, it is conceivable that any claims about the genetics of intelligence will also be applied in nontherapeutic ways (for example, in sex selection, employment decisions, or college admissions).…”