Class, Youth, and Sexuality in the Construction of the Lustmörder:

Abstract

In the early morning of 23 March 1928, two workers who were on their way to their shift discovered a body in front of the house at Schultenstrasse 11 in Gladbeck, a small town in the northern part of the industrial district of the Ruhr. 1 The men woke the physician Dr. Lutter, who lived close by. Dr. Lutter, after realizing that the person in question was beyond his help, went to his friend Adolf Daube, headmaster [Rektor] of the local Lutherschule, a protestant primary school, who lived at Schultenstrasse 11, and called the police. When Lutter and Daube stepped out to have a look at the body, Adolf Daube suddenly exclaimed, "But, this is my boy!" 2 The corpse was indeed that of Helmut Daube, Adolf Daube's nineteen-year-old son. Police from Gladbeck's criminal investigation department arrived twenty minutes later. 3 Daube's father knew that the night before his son had been out drinking with Karl Hussmann, a friend and former classmate. They had attended a recruiting evening [Keilabend] of the local branch of the right-wing student fraternity Alte Burschenschaftler in Buer, an hour's walk from Gladbeck. After Lutter found out that Hussmann and Daube had left the pub and headed back home together, he called Hussmann. Karl Hussmann answered the call rather quickly, given that he had been drinking the night before. Born in Guatemala in 1908, he was a half-orphan: his father had died on a journey from Guatemala to Germany in 1921. Therefore, Hussmann lived with foster parents, the family of the headmaster of a protestant school in Gladbeck-Rentfort, the Kleiböhmers. Hussmann considered himself Daube's closest friend. 4 Both young men had participated in a bible-reading "Crime and Criminal Justice in Modern Germany" Edited by Richard F. Wetzell is available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. This edition is supported by Knowledge Unlatched. OA ISBN: 978-1-78533-657-7. Not for resale.

Shape Sensing for an UAV Composite Half-Wing: Numerical Comparison between Modal Method and Ko’s Displacement Theory

“…To reduce the lack of information due to the omission of the high-frequency modes, the effect of including the residual vectors within the retained modes is explored in this work. The residual vectors are mode shapes based on the static response of the structure to given loads [20]. They can be computed using FE commercial codes.…”

“…In Equation (20), 𝑤𝑤 𝑖𝑖 is the deflection evaluated at the 𝑖𝑖 𝑡𝑡ℎ location by any of the two shape-sensing methods, 𝑤𝑤 𝑖𝑖 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 is the corresponding reference deflection of the finite element model, 𝑤𝑤 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑥𝑥 𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟 is the maximum FEM deflection and 𝑛𝑛 is the number of available reconstructed deflections. Since Ko's Displacement Theory is only able to evaluate deflections at the same locations where strains are known as input data on a specific measurement line, the error is evaluated per each sensing line and 𝑛𝑛 = 10, whereas the Modal Method allows a full-field reconstruction of deflections, thus 𝑛𝑛 = 1500, i.e., the whole set of nodes of the half-wing.…”

A comparison of bolus track and test bolus computed tomography pulmonary angiography and the implications on pulmonary and aortic vessel enhancement, effective dose and suboptimal scan rate

“…16 The effective dose was calculated by multiplying the DLP by a tissue weighting factor for the thorax (E = DLP W T (0.014)). This weighting factor is recommended for use on Siemens CT scan data 17 and the National Radiological Protection Board 18 and American Association of Physicists in Medicine. 19 The effective dose data are presented as the mean effective dose + À 95% confidence interval.…”