2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0895-9935(02)80006-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class, race, and gender and theorizing welfare states

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although class power theories usefully bring nonstate actors and interests into the picture, their analyses are developed at such a high level of abstraction that the middle-range institutional mechanisms of the sort that political institutionalists consider disappear. Class power approaches ultimately point to balance of class forces arguments—when labor is strong it wins social policy gains, when business is strong it rolls them back (Misra, 2002). While this has merit, it fails to theorize the specific ways labor and business influence social policy given the variation in the institutional constraints that they face and, as a result, fails to provide an adequate account of pension development in the postwar period.…”
Section: Approaches To Pension Development In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although class power theories usefully bring nonstate actors and interests into the picture, their analyses are developed at such a high level of abstraction that the middle-range institutional mechanisms of the sort that political institutionalists consider disappear. Class power approaches ultimately point to balance of class forces arguments—when labor is strong it wins social policy gains, when business is strong it rolls them back (Misra, 2002). While this has merit, it fails to theorize the specific ways labor and business influence social policy given the variation in the institutional constraints that they face and, as a result, fails to provide an adequate account of pension development in the postwar period.…”
Section: Approaches To Pension Development In the United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we propose that the feminization of poverty is a useful alternative perspective on cross-national variation in the intersection of gender and class (Misra 2002). In recent years, much has been learned about the feminization of poverty: women are more likely to be poor than men, U.S. feminization of poverty fluctuates over time (Bianchi 1999;McLanahan and Kelly 1999) and across racial/ethnic groups (Elmelech and Lu 2004), and the feminization of poverty varies cross-nationally (Casper et al 1994).…”
Section: Nearly Universal But Somewhat Distinct: the Feminization Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other scholars are less confident that economic egalitarianism will ensure gender equality and point to resilient gender inequalities in societies that are relatively economically equal (Misra 2002;Sainsbury 1999). As McCall (2001 contends, gender inequality is not simply reducible to overall economic inequality.…”
Section: Coherence or Divergence Between Dimensions Of Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation