1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class, Power and Social Construction: Issues of Theory and Application in Thirty Years of Rural Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second debate can be seen to be more rather specific in that it focuses on the issue of rural class analysis. However, as this paper and others (see Miller, 1996a;Murdoch, 1995b;Phillips, 1998b) have argued, there are important lines of connection between the conduct of rural class analysis and changes in the philosophical discourses of the social sciences. In particular it is suggested that the future of class analysis, both within and beyond, rural studies, has tended to be constructed as a dualistic choice between a 'modernist class analysis', generally employing some variant of a political-economy perspective, and a postmodernism/ poststructuralism in which class has completely receded from view, to be replaced by a focus on the discursive construction of largely non-class identities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second debate can be seen to be more rather specific in that it focuses on the issue of rural class analysis. However, as this paper and others (see Miller, 1996a;Murdoch, 1995b;Phillips, 1998b) have argued, there are important lines of connection between the conduct of rural class analysis and changes in the philosophical discourses of the social sciences. In particular it is suggested that the future of class analysis, both within and beyond, rural studies, has tended to be constructed as a dualistic choice between a 'modernist class analysis', generally employing some variant of a political-economy perspective, and a postmodernism/ poststructuralism in which class has completely receded from view, to be replaced by a focus on the discursive construction of largely non-class identities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…So, for example, notions of 'de-traditionalisation' and 'new-sociations' suggest, amongst other things, that neither a person's self-consciousness identity nor their activity patterns need to be tied necessarily to class relations. One consequence of this has arguably been the 'retreat' from class analysis as discerned by Miller (1996a) or more precisely, I would argue, a dualistic construction of the future of class analysis whereby researchers are presented with "a stark choice" between a 'modernist class analysis' or a 'postmodernism' [or poststructuralism] where class has completely receded from view (Phillips, 1998a, p. 412). Such a dualistic choice is unhelpful, not least in that it ignores: i) the similarities between modern and postmodernist or poststructuralist analyses; ii) the differences within each perspectives; and iii) the important silences within both perspectives (Phillips, 1998a).…”
Section: Poststructuralism and Rural Class Analysis: Challenges And Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation