2014
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.6761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class‐modeling approach to PTR‐TOFMS data: a peppers case study

Abstract: Based on the promising results, the possibility of introducing multivariate class-modeling techniques, different from the classification approaches, in the field of volatile compounds analyses is discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The partitioning of the models for M3, which include all the sampling times, was conducted optimally by choosing the Euclidean distances based on the algorithm of Kennard & Stone (1969) that selects objects without the a priori knowledge of a regression model. A summary of the relative importance of the Xvariables for both Y and X model parts is given by Variable Importance in the Projection (VIP - Taiti et al 2015, Infantino et al 2015. VIP scores estimate the importance of each variable in the PLS-based models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partitioning of the models for M3, which include all the sampling times, was conducted optimally by choosing the Euclidean distances based on the algorithm of Kennard & Stone (1969) that selects objects without the a priori knowledge of a regression model. A summary of the relative importance of the Xvariables for both Y and X model parts is given by Variable Importance in the Projection (VIP - Taiti et al 2015, Infantino et al 2015. VIP scores estimate the importance of each variable in the PLS-based models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In PLS-R and PLS-DA methods, a summary of the relative importance of the X-variables for both Y and X model parts is given by Variable Importance in the Projection (VIP) [31,32]. It is a weighted sum of squares of the PLS weights, taking into account the amount of explained Y-variance in each PLS component [33].…”
Section: Multivariate Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent variables (X-block) datasets were standardised using an autoscale algorithm (i.e., centers columns to zero mean and scales to unit variance). For each PLS model a summary of the relative importance of the independent variables (Y-block) to predict the dependent one is given by variable importance in the projection (VIP) (Febbi et al, 2015;Taiti et al, 2015). The VIP scores estimate the importance of each variable in the PLS-based models and were calculated according to Chong & Jun (2005).…”
Section: Multivariate Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%