2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15,26 This miniplate established the framework for absolute anchorage against which the orthopedic retraction force was applied. A custom-made C-palatal retractor was then bonded to the palatal surface of the maxillary 6 anterior teeth to consolidate them as a single unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,26 This miniplate established the framework for absolute anchorage against which the orthopedic retraction force was applied. A custom-made C-palatal retractor was then bonded to the palatal surface of the maxillary 6 anterior teeth to consolidate them as a single unit.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Segmental orthodontics can be a good choice for this, 4,5 and biocreative therapy for anterior retraction offers a further advantage since fixed posterior appliances are not necessary. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Orthodontists often choose to remove premolars to retract crowded or protrusive anterior teeth. Location and management of the center of resistance with respect to retraction force vectors (Cres) is critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19][20][21] Biocreative therapy was developed to enable retraction without involving the posterior segments and thus avoid such side effects. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] The C-implant supports some osseointegration and accomplishes controlled anterior retraction with a ,1 mm change in the posterior unbracketed segments. Normal home care is possible for these patients since the posterior teeth are free of appliances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the appliances used in the SSO protocol (C-lingual retractor and C-palatal mini-plate) overcome the need for orthodontic therapy during en masse retraction, reducing the time required for labial fixation of orthodontic appliances. 25 Fourth, the amount of retraction of a dental segment facilitated by SSO is much greater than that possible by most conventional orthodontic retraction methods. Hence, SSO overcomes the need of orthognathic surgery or anterior segmental osteotomy under general anesthesia for the correction of skeletal maxillary protrusion in adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%