Class II major histocompatibility complex mutant mice to study the germ-line bias of T-cell antigen receptors

Abstract

The interaction of αβ T-cell antigen receptors (TCRs) with peptides bound to MHC molecules lies at the center of adaptive immunity. Whether TCRs have evolved to react with MHC or, instead, processes in the thymus involving coreceptors and other molecules select MHC-specific TCRs de novo from a random repertoire is a longstanding immunological question. Here, using nuclease-targeted mutagenesis, we address this question in vivo by generating three independent lines of knockin mice with single-amino acid mutations of conserved class II MHC amino acids that often are involved in interactions with the germ-line-encoded portions of TCRs. Although the TCR repertoire generated in these mutants is similar in size and diversity to that in WT mice, the evolutionary bias of TCRs for MHC is suggested by a shift and preferential use of some TCR subfamilies over others in mice expressing the mutant class II MHCs. Furthermore, T cells educated on these mutant MHC molecules are alloreactive to each other and to WT cells, and vice versa, suggesting strong functional differences among these repertoires. Taken together, these results highlight both the flexibility of thymic selection and the evolutionary bias of TCRs for MHC.T he genes for immunoglobulins (Igs), αβ T-cell receptors (TCRs), and antigen-presenting MHC proteins appeared at least 450 million years ago in the cartilaginous fish and are present in all modern vertebrates (1-3). The more primitive hagfish and lampreys lack these genes and have an adaptive immune system comprised of unrelated proteins (4). The main ligands for αβ TCRs are short peptides derived from self and foreign proteins, captured in a specialized groove of MHC class I (MHCI) and class II (MHCII) molecules and presented to T cells (5, 6). Functional Igs and TCRs are created by very similar recombination mechanisms involving fusion of V, J, and sometimes D gene segments with additional variations at the junctions to create an enormous potential repertoire of Igs and TCRs, suggesting a common, unknown evolutionary origin for these loci.These observations have raised several unanswered questions. For example,why did a separate TCR-rearranging gene system develop for lymphocytes recognizing peptide-MHC ligands? How did the extraordinarily polymorphic MHC genes stay functionally connected to TCR genes throughout 450 million years of evolution? One long-standing hypothesis has been that certain features of TCRs and MHC molecules are evolutionarily conserved to promote their interaction (7-10). Like Igs, the antigen-recognition portions of TCRs are partially encoded in the complementary determining region (CDR) CDR1 and CDR2 loops of germ-line TCR Vα (TRAV) and Vβ (TRBV) genes and are partially generated by somatic recombination processes that form the CDR3 loops. This initial repertoire is culled dramatically during T-cell development in the thymus. First, only those T cells whose TCRs have at least some minimal affinity for the selfpeptide-MHC molecules expressed in the thymus are positively selected for fu...

The somatically generated portion of T cell receptor CDR3α contributes to the MHC allele specificity of the T cell receptor

“…To be sure that the TCRα chains analyzed in our experimental mice were actually those involved in positive selection of the cells bearing them, we crossed the DOβWT or DOβ48A transgenic, TCRβ-/- mice with TCRα-/- TCRβ-/- animals of each MHC haplotype to generate animals that were DOβWT or DOβ48A transgenic, TCRβ-/-, TCRα+/-. Naïve CD4 T cells were isolated from the lymph nodes of these animals and cDNA coding for their TCRαs were sequenced as previously described ( Silberman et al, 2016 ). PCR and sequencing errors in the germ line encoded portions of these sequences were corrected as described in the Materials and methods section.…”

Quantitative, Label‐Free Proteomics in the Symptomatic Niemann–Pick, Type C1 Mouse Model Using Standard Flow Liquid Chromatography and Thermal Focusing Electrospray Ionization

“…Here, aliquots of 100 µg were prepared for each of the cerebral cortex samples and 1 mg of each of the cerebella sample. To increase the depth of our proteomic analysis of the cerebellar tissue, 900 µg of each of the cerebellar digests were fractionated into 20 samples using a Waters XBridge BEH130 C18 3.5 µm 4.6 × 250 mm column using a Lab Alliance HPLC system as previously described . All samples were dried and resuspended in 0.1% (v/v) formic acid prior to analysis.…”

Germline-encoded TCR-MHC contacts promote TCR V gene bias in umbilical cord blood T cell repertoire

“…Notably, structures that composed of TRBV13 has been extensively studied in mouse. Complexes that include TRBV13-2 show that amino acids in its CDR2 loop react with related sites on the MHCII α1 helix despite various docking angles of the TCR, and TRBV13-1 CDR1 and CDR2 loops have more than one docking site on α1 helix and shifts according to docking positions 24 . A dynamic interplay between TCR and MHC molecules has gathered more and more evidence.…”