2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.109868
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class-based differences in the use of (aggressive) humor: The mediating role of empathic concern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
15
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, in this socioeconomic climate, class disparities and their detrimental wide-ranging consequences across distinct domains are more visible (Moya and Fiske, 2017). Although it could be argued that almost all people's psychological and social outcomes are largely influenced by their objective or perceived socioeconomic standing, ranging from food preferences (Baumann et al, 2019) and speech patterns (Kraus et al, 2019) to humorrelated dispositions (Navarro-Carrillo et al, 2020) and identity (Easterbrook et al, 2020), empirical research has mainly focused on investigating the connections between SES and psychological well-being and health-related aspects (e.g., Howell and Howell, 2008;Curhan et al, 2014;Präg et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in this socioeconomic climate, class disparities and their detrimental wide-ranging consequences across distinct domains are more visible (Moya and Fiske, 2017). Although it could be argued that almost all people's psychological and social outcomes are largely influenced by their objective or perceived socioeconomic standing, ranging from food preferences (Baumann et al, 2019) and speech patterns (Kraus et al, 2019) to humorrelated dispositions (Navarro-Carrillo et al, 2020) and identity (Easterbrook et al, 2020), empirical research has mainly focused on investigating the connections between SES and psychological well-being and health-related aspects (e.g., Howell and Howell, 2008;Curhan et al, 2014;Präg et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a representative study, a series of experiments by Piff et al 7 revealed that people with high SC, as measured mainly by subjective indicators and objective indicators such as owning vehicles, were more likely to break the law while driving, steal valuable goods from others, lie in negotiations, commit fraud to increase the likelihood of winning prizes, and take unethical actions in the workplace (increase sales by, for example, making personal long-distance calls at work or overcharging customers) than people with low SC. Other studies showed that people with a high SC, in contrast to those with a low SC, had a lower characteristic score for compassion 8 ; inaccurate emotional reasoning related to others 9 ; more behaviors that indicate a lack of attention to others, such as playing with one's hands and doodling when interacting with strangers 10 ; and a tendency to engage in humor to control others 11 .…”
Section: Social Class and Prosocialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navarro-Carrillo et al 11 examined the association between humor and SC assessed by subjective indicators and objective indicators such as income and educational attainment. In their study, they hypothesized that SC is negatively correlated with a liative humor and positively associated with aggressive humor based on theories that emphasize the self-centered and sel sh tendencies of people with high SC 27,28 .…”
Section: Sc and Humormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…); self-enhancing humor enhances the self by finding humorous or positive aspects in daily events to reduce stress by using humor as an emotion regulation mechanism (e.g., Remember funny situations to overcome stress and tension. ); aggressive humor is other-focused and boosts the self at the expense of other people by ridiculing or putting them down; self-defeating humor attempts to amuse others to gain approval by saying or doing funny things while ridiculing oneself (Navarro-Carrillo et al, 2020). Referring to the above can be considered affiliative and selfenhancing humor styles are positive or constructive, and aggressive and self-defeating humor styles are negative or destructive.…”
Section: Positive Vs Negative Humormentioning
confidence: 99%