1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3794(97)00030-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Class and voting in the 1996 Australian federal election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the finding in Charnock (1997b) that work-related factors remained important in voting at the 1996 election, despite conventional measures of occupational class showing only limited association with voting.…”
Section: Odds Ratio Changes Presentation Of Model Csupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is consistent with the finding in Charnock (1997b) that work-related factors remained important in voting at the 1996 election, despite conventional measures of occupational class showing only limited association with voting.…”
Section: Odds Ratio Changes Presentation Of Model Csupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A second strand of the Australian literature has looked at the relationship between identities and voting behavior. Substantial literatures exist on the relationship between self-identified class and electoral behavior (McAllister, 1992;Goot, 1994;Charnock, 1997); post-materialist values and voting (Gow, 1990;Western and Tranter, 2001); as well as the relationship between attitudes to leadership and voting (Marks 1993). Yet because partisan identification and voting behavior are as much identities as class, post-materialist values, and attitudes towards political leaders, it is difficult to see how one might unpack the causal relationship.…”
Section: A Model Of Quasi-rational Partisan Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. Charnock (1997) finds that education had a slight, but not statistically significant, association with Labor vote in 1996.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…13. Charnock (1997) provides a detailed analysis of the influences on voting choice in 1996. BIBLIOGRAPHY…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%