2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12580-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarifying the taxonomy of some cryptic blennies (Blenniidae) in their native and introduced range

Abstract: Omobranchus punctatus is native to the Indo-Pacific region and invasive in the Atlantic region, currently being considered one of the most widely distributed blenny species. However, recent molecular studies indicated that O. punctatus is a complex of species, with three divergent mtDNA lineages identified to date, stressing the need for a taxonomic revision. In this study, we used an integrative approach, combining morphological and genetic data, to shed light on the taxonomy and distribution of O. punctatus.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study, therefore, reveals the complex combinations of morphological and molecular similarities and differences (Figures 1-6), which contradict the simplistic division into 'cryptic' or 'non-cryptic' species groups, which only superficially appear indistinguishable until detailed integration of niche, molecular data, or other lines of evidence reveal clearly different and distinguishable species lineages [79]. This contrast led to a misleading distinction between 'cryptic', 'pseudocryptic' and just 'ordinary' species [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]; see detailed discussion in [16,18,63,88,89]. This consideration is of crucial importance for practical taxonomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our study, therefore, reveals the complex combinations of morphological and molecular similarities and differences (Figures 1-6), which contradict the simplistic division into 'cryptic' or 'non-cryptic' species groups, which only superficially appear indistinguishable until detailed integration of niche, molecular data, or other lines of evidence reveal clearly different and distinguishable species lineages [79]. This contrast led to a misleading distinction between 'cryptic', 'pseudocryptic' and just 'ordinary' species [80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87]; see detailed discussion in [16,18,63,88,89]. This consideration is of crucial importance for practical taxonomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This is not the first example of a non‐indigenous species reported from areas close to Port of Santos and Paranaguá. Other fish species like Butis koilomatodon (Bleeker 1849) (Contente et al., 2016; Macieira et al., 2012), Opsanus beta (Goode & Bean, 1880) (Carvalho et al., 2022) and Omobranchus sewalli (Fowler, 1931) (Cabezas et al., 2022) were also reported from areas near those ports. The Brazilian navy claim that every ship must replace the ballast water in high seas (Costa et al., 2016), however non‐indigenous fish species are being reported continuously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%