1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(01)85682-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarification of the mechanism of rearrangement of enol silyl ether epoxides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The synthesis of the second building block 6 a (Scheme ) started from the inexpensive commercially available natural product chrysin ( 13 ), which after double O ‐benzylation was degraded by retro‐aldol reaction to the resulting acetophenone derivative ( 14 ) as described by Caldwell et al . α‐Oxidation under Rubottom conditions then furnished the hydroxylated product 15 . It is worth noting that, despite the modest yield, this method opened a reliable and practical access to 15 on a multigram scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The synthesis of the second building block 6 a (Scheme ) started from the inexpensive commercially available natural product chrysin ( 13 ), which after double O ‐benzylation was degraded by retro‐aldol reaction to the resulting acetophenone derivative ( 14 ) as described by Caldwell et al . α‐Oxidation under Rubottom conditions then furnished the hydroxylated product 15 . It is worth noting that, despite the modest yield, this method opened a reliable and practical access to 15 on a multigram scale.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent Pinnick oxidation [14] of the aldehyde functiong ave the carboxylic acid 5a.T op repare for the planned ester formation (see Scheme 2), this buildingb lock was further converted into the HOBT-activated ester 12, [15] which provedt ob ee asy to handle and was stable for months without significant decomposition. [16] The synthesis of the second building block 6a (Scheme 4) started from the inexpensive commerciallya vailablen atural product chrysin (13), whicha fter double O-benzylation was degraded by retro-aldol reaction to the resulting acetophenone derivative( 14)a sd escribed by Caldwell et al [17] a-Oxidation under Rubottom conditions [17,18] then furnished the hydroxylated product 15.I ti sw orth noting that, despitet he modest yield, this methodo penedareliable and practical access to 15 on am ultigram scale. Lastly,t he installation of a b-galactose moiety wasa ccomplished in good yield by reacting am ixture of the alcohol 15 with peracetylated b-galactose in the presence of BF 3 -etherate as aL ewis acid at room temperature.…”
Section: And Naturalp Roductsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As before, the diagnostic coupling constants demonstrated that acetoxylation had occurred syn to the isopropyl and methyl substituents. As the rearrangement associated with the Rubottom protocol can be safely assumed to occur by retention,18 we must conclude that epoxidation had again occurred from the β face. The assignment of the stereochemistry of 17 was confirmed by its ultimate transformation into guanacastepene A (Scheme ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Because of the inherent electronegativity of most heteroatoms listed in the preceding sentence (O, N, and halogens), their derivatives are also typically nucleophilic in nature. Introducing such a species into the α-position of a carbonyl therefore formally requires an oxidation event, either in the reaction itself 3,4 or in the generation of highly reactive electrophilic heteroatom reagents. 57 Although this can result in poor functional group tolerance under the reaction conditions, it more significantly means that a truly unified approach has failed to materialize, with specific reagents required for each element (Figure 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the recognition of the synthetic value of nucleophilic enolates, available by treatment of a carbonyl precursor with a strong base, has rendered them the reactants of choice for C–C, C–O, C–N, C–S, and C–halogen bond formation at the α-position of a carbonyl moiety for more than half a century. , Because of the inherent electronegativity of most heteroatoms listed in the preceding sentence (O, N, and halogens), their derivatives are also typically nucleophilic in nature. Introducing such a species into the α-position of a carbonyl therefore formally requires an oxidation event, either in the reaction itself , or in the generation of highly reactive electrophilic heteroatom reagents. Although this can result in poor functional group tolerance under the reaction conditions, it more significantly means that a truly unified approach has failed to materialize, with specific reagents required for each element (Figure a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%