1984
DOI: 10.2307/3801467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clarification of a Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
353
1
33

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 626 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
353
1
33
Order By: Relevance
“…If the expected value was within the confidence intervals, then I concluded that the habitat was used in proportion to its availability. If lower, then the habitat was selected, whereas if higher, then the habitat was avoided (Byers et al 1984). Habitat classes where there was no bat activity (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the expected value was within the confidence intervals, then I concluded that the habitat was used in proportion to its availability. If lower, then the habitat was selected, whereas if higher, then the habitat was avoided (Byers et al 1984). Habitat classes where there was no bat activity (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the differences in habitat use and availability by pack using contingency table analysis. We compared habitat use to habitat availability within the home range for each pack during each biological season using independent v 2 -tests and Bonferroni confidence intervals (Neu et al 1974;Byers et al 1984). Because the coyotes did not use diverse terrain (i.e., the valley is relatively flat), we were primarily interested in habitat use based on vegetation types, so the information added by using a resource selection function would have been superfluous.…”
Section: Habitat Use and Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partir do teste do qui-quadrado de qualidade de ajustamento ("chi-square goodness-of-fit test") e posterior estimativa do intervalo simultâneo de confiança de Bonferroni (Byers et al, 1984), foi possível verificar de maneira significativa, mesmo com um baixo número de registros (n=44), que a única classe de uso preferida pelo veado-catingueiro foi a MC e, de maneira contrária, houve rejeição à classe CJSC (Tabs I, II).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Para avaliar se houve uso desproporcional das classes pelo veado-catingueiro em relação à disponibilidade das mesmas, utilizou-se o teste do qui-quadrado de qualidade de ajustamento ("chisquare goodness-of-fit test") e posterior estimativa do intervalo simultâneo de confiança de Bonferroni (Byers et al, 1984). Considerou-se que houve seleção quando o uso foi desproporcional à disponibilidade (seleção de 3ª ordem, Johnson, 1980).…”
Section: Methodsunclassified