2011
DOI: 10.1017/s0738248011000010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Claiming the New World: Empire, Law, and Indigenous Rights in the Mohegan Case, 1704–1743

Abstract: In 1773, with the empire on the brink of revolt, the Privy Council gave the final ruling in the case of the Mohegan Indians versus the colony of Connecticut. Thus ended what one eighteenth-century lawyer called “the greatest cause that ever was heard at the Council Board.” After a decades-long battle for their rights, involving several appeals to the Crown, three royal commissions, and the highest court in the empire, the Mohegans' case against Connecticut was dismissed. The dispute centered on a large tract o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These too are beginnings but they also point to another standpoint which legal historians, and sociolegal scholars, ought to pay attention to: that of Indigenous Peoples. These Peoples had their own ‘conceptions of law, property, and political authority’ with which they responded to ‘European claims’ (Yirush, 2011a: 129; 2011b: 371). The studies of how European nations laid claims to ‘new’ lands, how they interacted with other peoples, how these peoples responded and how the European lawyers justified or questioned the legality of their expansion illustrate moments of doubt, when the orderliness of law struggled (see e.g.…”
Section: The Idea(s) Of Law In Legal Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These too are beginnings but they also point to another standpoint which legal historians, and sociolegal scholars, ought to pay attention to: that of Indigenous Peoples. These Peoples had their own ‘conceptions of law, property, and political authority’ with which they responded to ‘European claims’ (Yirush, 2011a: 129; 2011b: 371). The studies of how European nations laid claims to ‘new’ lands, how they interacted with other peoples, how these peoples responded and how the European lawyers justified or questioned the legality of their expansion illustrate moments of doubt, when the orderliness of law struggled (see e.g.…”
Section: The Idea(s) Of Law In Legal Historymentioning
confidence: 99%